Primerjava načel znanstvenega menedžmenta in vitkega proizvajanja
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37886/ruo.2020.016Ključne besede:
menedžer, načela, sodobni prejemi, Taylor, uspešnost, vitko proizvajanje, znanstveni menedžmentPovzetek
Raziskovalno vprašanje (RV): Ali prinašajo načela in dejavniki vitkega proizvajanja bistveno drugačna načela od Taylorjevega znanstvenega menedžmenta?
Namen: Preveriti želimo, ali so načela in dejavniki vitkega proizvajanja dramatično drugačni v primerjavi z znanstvenim menedžmentom.
Metoda: Uporabili smo integrativni pregled strokovne literature za preteklih 40 let (od 1980−2020), v kateri so bila opisana načela in dejavniki znanstvenega menedžmenta in vitkega proizvajanja.
Rezultati: Avtorji preučevanih znanstvenih publikacij zagovarjajo mnenje, da načela in dejavniki vitkega proizvajanja ne prinašajo bistveno drugačnih načela od Taylorjevega znanstvenega menedžmenta. Njegova dela je zato potrebno brati in interpretirati skozi očala družbeno-ekonomskih in socialnih razlik v času nastanka njegovih del (začetek dvajsetega stoletja) in danes.
Organizacija: Pogosto je razlog za uvajanje sprememb v organizacijo napačen, namesto novih organizacijskih prejemov podjetje potrebuje samo dosledno upoštevanje obstoječih načel v kombinaciji z zavzetostjo vodstva. Zavedanje, da organizaciji ne bo pomagal noben organizacijski prejem brez zavzetega vodstva in da ji bo pomagal vsak z zavzetim vodstvom, organizacijam prihrani veliko časa in denarja.
Družba: Napredek in uspeh v organizaciji se lahko enakovredno doseže z uporabo načel znanstvenega menedžmenta kot z načeli vitke organizacije in brez svetovanja zunanjih svetovalcev, pogoj za to je dosledna uporaba načel enega ali drugega pristopa. S tem dosežemo, da se čim več organizacij bolj posveča dejanski implementaciji teh načel v svoje procese, ne glede iz katerega koncepta prihajajo.
Originalnost: Uspeh v organizaciji se lahko enakovredno doseže z uporabo načel znanstvenega menedžmenta kot z načeli vitke organizacije. Za to je najbolj pomembna zavzetost in predanost vrhnjega menedžmenta izvajanim načelom.
Omejitve/nadaljnje raziskovanje: Anketa o naših ugotovitvah med slovenskim menedžmentom bi smiselno dopolnila naš članek.
Literatura
Adams, D. E., Smith T. & Urick M. J. (2017). Taylorism and Operational Excellence Improving on the "One Best Way". Journal of Leadership and Management, 9(10), 7−21.
Adler, P. S. (1993). “Democratic taylorism”: the toyota production system at NUMMI. Pridobljeno na: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Paul_Adler/publication
Bartezzaghi, E. (1999). The evolution of production models: is a new paradigm emerging? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(2), 229–250. doi:10.1108/01443579910247446
Bateman, N., Esain, A., Massey, L., Rich, N., & Samuel. D. (2006). Lean Evolution:Lessons from the Workplace. New York: Cambridge Univesitiy Press.
Blake, A. M., & Moseley, J. L. (2010). One hundred years afterThe Principles of Scientific Management: Frederick Taylor’s life and impact on the field of human performance technology. Performance Improvement, 49(4), 27–34. doi:10.1002/pfi.20141
Brennan, L.L. (2011). The Scientific Management of Information Overload. Journal of Business and Management, 17(1), 121−134.
Brogan, J. W. (2011). Exonerating Frederick Taylor: after 100 years, mythology sometimes overshadows a master's teachings. Industrial Engineer, 43(11), 41−45.
Cattero, B. (1995). Nicht nur Verschwendung: über Redundanz und slack in der schlanken Produktion. In M. Birke, B. Hurrle, G. Hurrle, & V. Mertens (Hrsg.) Pridobljeno na: https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/bitstream/handle/document/42972/ssoar-1995-cattero-Nicht_nur_Verschwendung__uber.pdf?sequence=1
Charron, R., Harrington, H. J., Voehl, F., & Wiggin, H. (2015). The lean management systems handbook. Boca Ration: Taylor & Francis Group.
Chauhan, G., & Singh, T. P. (2012). Measuring parameters of lean manufacturing realization. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(3), 57–71. doi:10.1108/13683041211257411
Corbacioglu S. (2017). Influence Of Taylorism On Deming’s Quality Management. Sarajevo Journal of Social Sciences Inquiry. 2 (2) 77−78. doi: 10.21533/isjss.v2i2.85
Corwin, S. (2003). Picturing Efficiency: Precisionism, Scientific Management, and the Effacement of Labor. Representations, 84(1), 139–165. doi:10.1525/rep.2003.84.1.139
Dalcher, D. (2017). What has Taylor ever done for us? Scientific and humane management reconsidered. PM World Journal, 4(4), 1−11.
Emiliani, M. L. (2006). Origins of lean management in America. Journal of Management History, 12(2), 167–184. doi:10.1108/13552520610654069
Evangelopoulos, N. (2011). Citing Taylor: Tracing Taylorism’s Technical and Sociotechnical Duality through Latent Semantic Analysis. Journal of Business & Management, 17(1), 57−72.
Fairris, D., & Tohyama, H. (2002). Productive Efficiency and the Lean Production System in Japan and the United States. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 23(4), 529−554. doi: 10.1177/0143831X02234004
Forza, C. (1996). Work organization in lean production and traditional plants. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2), 42–62. doi:10.1108/01443579610109839
Fujimoto, T. (1999). The Evolution of a Manufacturing System at Toyota. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Grachev, M., & Rakitsky, B. (2013). Historic horizons of Frederick Taylor’s scientific management. Journal of Management History, 19(4), 512–527. doi:10.1108/jmh-05-2012-0043
Giannantonio C. M. & Hurley-Hanson A. E. (2011) Frederick Winslow Taylor: Reflections on the Relevance of The Principles of Scientific Management 100 Years Later. Journal of Business & Management, 17(1), 7−10.
Handel M. J. (2014). Theories of lean management: An empirical evaluation. Social Science Research, 44 86–102. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.10.009
Hill, V., & Van Buren, H. (2018). Taylor Won: The Triumph of Scientific Management and Its Meaning for Business and Society. Corporate Social Responsibility, 265–294. doi:10.1108/s2514-175920180000002007
Hines, P., Rich, N., & Esain, A. (1999). Value stream mapping. International Journal, 6(1), 60−77. doi:10.1108/14635779910258157
Hines, P., Holweg, M., & Rich, N. (2004). Learning to evolve. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 24(10), 994–1011. doi:10.1108/01443570410558049
Hopp, W. J. (2018). Positive lean: merging the science of efficiency with the psychology of work. International Journal of Production Research, 56(1–2), 398–413. doi:10.1080/00207543.2017.1387301
Huang, K. P., Tung, J., Lo, S. C., & Chou, M. J. (2013). A review and critical analysis of the principles of scientific management. The international journal of organizational innovation, 5(4), 1−233.
Hummels, H., & de Leede, J. (2000). Teamwork and Morality: Comparing Lean Production and Sociotechnology. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(1), 75–88. doi:10.1023/a:1006242516664
Jenner, R. (1998). Dissipative enterprises, chaos, and the principles of lean organizations. Omega, 26(3), 397–407. doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(97)00067-4
Krafcik, J. F., 1988. The triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Review 30(1), 41–52.
Kulesza, M. G., Weaver, P., & Friedman, S. (2011). Frederick W. Taylor's presence in 21st century management accounting systems and work process theories. Journal of Business & Management, 17(1) 105−119.
Liker J. K. (2006). The Toyota way. New york: McGraw-Hill
Liker J. K. (2004). The Toyota way. 14 Management Principles from the World s Greatest. New york: McGraw-Hill
Locke, E. A. (1982). The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 14−24.
Paez, O., Dewees, J., Genaidy, A., Tuncel, S., Karwowski, W., & Zurada, J. (2004). The lean manufacturing enterprise: An emerging sociotechnological system integration. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14(3), 285–306. doi:10.1002/hfm.10067
Payne, S. C., Youngcourt, S. S., & Watrous, K. M. (2006). Portrayals of F. W. Taylor across textbooks. Journal of Management History, 12(4), 385–407. doi:10.1108/17511340610692752
Parkes, A. (2015). Lean Management Genesis. Management, 19(2), 106–121. doi:10.1515/manment-2015-0017
Parks, C. M. (2003). The bare necessities of lean: 10 things your lean guru may not tell you about making just-in-time work. Industrial Engineer, 35(8), 1−39.
Pearce, A. D., & Pons, D. J. (2018). Defining Lean Change—Framing Lean Implementation in Organizational Development. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(4) 10−22. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v12n4p10
Peaucelle, J. (2000). From Taylorism to post‐Taylorism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(5), 452–467. doi:10.1108/09534810010377426
Rask, K., & Johansson, J. (2008). Similarities and differences between lean production, Tayloristic and socio-technical systems revealed in the methodology characteristics map. Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, 995−1001
Rawlinson, M., & Wells, P. (1996). Taylorism, Lean Production and the Automotive Industry. Asia Pacific Business Review, 2(4), 189–204. doi:10.1080/13602389600000026
Ribeiro, A. F. (2015). Taylorismo, fordismo e toyotismo. (Taylorism, Fordism and Toyotism) Lutas Sociais, 19(35), 65−79.
Rossler, P., & Beruvidis, M. (1994). Management theory déjà vu? scientific and total quality management. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 6(2), 6−15. doi: 10.1080/10429247.1994.11414780
Short J. C. (2011). The Debate Goes On! A Graphic Portrayal Of The Sinclair-Taylor Editorial Dialogue. Journal of Business & Management 17(1) 43−56.
Spear, S., & Bowen, H.K. (1999), “Decoding the DNA of the Toyota production system”. Harvard Business Review, Vol. 77(5) 97−106.
Simha, A., & Lemak, D. (2010). The value of original source readings in management education: The case of Frederick Winslow Taylor. Journal of Management History, 16(2), 233−252. doi: 10.1108/17511341011030129
Su, Y. (2017). Taylor Scientific Management Theory Carding and Significance of Organization Management. Social Sciences, 6(4), 102−107. doi: 10.11648/j.ss.20170604.12
Arlbjørn, J.S., & Freytag, P.V. (2013). Evidence of lean: a review of international peer reviewed journal articles. European Business Review, 25(2), 174−205.
Tadajewski, M., & Jones, D. G. B. (2012). Scientific marketing management and the emergence of the ethical marketing concept. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1−2), 37–61. doi:10.1080/0267257x.2011.619072
Tang, H. (2017). The Implications of Taylorism, Contingency Theory, Behavioral Management Theory and Systems Theory on Organization Management in the Globalization Era: A Comparative and Critical Review. 4th International Conference on Education & Training, Management and Humanities Science (ETMHS 2018). str. 119−122, doi: 10.23977/etmhs.2018.29027
Taylor, F. W. (1967) Upravljanje pogonom (Shop management). Beograd: Izdavačko preduzeće Rad.
Taylor, F. W. (1967) Naučno upravljanje (Scientific Management). Beograd: Izdavačko preduzeće Rad.
Turan, H. (2015). Taylor’s “Scientific Management Principles”: Contemporary Issues in Personnel Selection Period. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(11), 1102−1105. doi: 10.7763/joebm.2015.v3.342
Vijai, J. P., Somayaji, G. S. R., Swamy, R. J. R., & Aital, P. (2017). Relevance of F.W. Taylor’s principles to modern shop-floor practices. Benchmarking. International Journal, 24(2), 445–466. doi:10.1108/bij-02-2015-0019
Womack, J. P., Jones, D., T., & Roos D. (1990). The Machine that changed the World. New York: Rawson Associates.
Wren, D. A., & Bedeian, A. G. (2004). The Taylorization of Lenin: rhetoric or reality? International Journal of Social Economics, 31(3), 287–299. doi:10.1108/03068290410518265
Unterlechner,M., Meško Štok, Z., & Markič, M.(2009). Inoviranje, kakovost in Lean Six Sigma v proizvodnem procesu. Koper: Fakulteta za management.
