Promoting Creativity and Innovation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37886/ruo.2021.026Keywords:
creativity, innovation, organization, economic benefit, employee satisfaction, employee promotionAbstract
Research Question (RV): Do organizations encourage creativity and innovation, which can have a strong impact on products and business at the same time?
Purpose: Identify and analyze the assessment of the fundamental building block of the EFQM model of excellence – creativi and innovation. Make suggestions for improvment based on the findings.
Method: Using a qualitative method, reviewing professional and scientific literature, using a research method with analytical analysis and extracting the essence and findings from them.
Results: The results showed that organizations have a well-developed innovative and creative activity, but the trend in all evaluation components of the EFQM model of excellence is negative, so we made suggestions for improvements. Also, the assessment of the our company building block is satisfactory. All the professional literature examined llists the main activities needed to continuously improve creativty and innovation in organizations.
Organization: The research has a great impact on organizations, as the assessment of the building blocks of EFQM excellence in the field of creativity and innovation provided a starting point for change.
Society: With the research we want to point out that this area is very important, so it is necessary to invest a lot in it in the future, so that the fruits of creativity and innovation will always bear fruit.
Originality: The contribution of the profession is in the originality of the research. We have not yet seen research on promoting creativity and innovation displayed through the building blocks of EFQM excellence.
Limitations / further research: The survery is limited to only one building block with seven EFQM substructures. It would make sense to make comparative analyzes of different companies. The impact of creativity and innovation on productivity in an organization could be examined below. organizations.
References
Berginc, J. (2001). Ustvarjalnost in inovativnost v podjetju. Portorož: Visoka strokovna šola.
Bijek, L. (2019). Odnosi, komunikacija, motivacija in nagrajevanje kot dejavniki uspešnega tima in organizacije. Revija za univerzalno odličnost, junij, 2019 letnik št.2., str. 179-192.
Drucker, P. (2007). Inovation and entrepeneurship: praztic and principles. Amsterdam: Butterworth – Heinemann.
Guštin, N. (2006). Aktiviranje ustvarjalnosti za večjo inovativnost poslovanja podjetja. Magistrsko delo. Maribor. Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta
Hojč, D. (2019). Model vpliva dodane vrednosti za odjemalce ter inovativnost. Revija za univerzalno odličnost, jun. 2019, letnik 8, št.2., str. 174
Ilič, B. (2002). Sociekonomska analiza spodbude za inoviranje v podjetju. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
FOŠmeter poslovne odličnosti. (2020). Preglednica ocen. Novo mesto: Fakulteta za organizacijske študije.
Kligl, A. (2010). Ustvarjalnost in inovativnost slovenskih podjetij. Diplomsko delo. Maribor: Ekonomska poslovna fakulteta.
Kos, M. (1996). Inovacijski menedžment. Priročnik za mala in velika podjetja. Ljubljana: FDV.
Kranjc, D. (2013). Ustvarjalnost kot pogoj za inovativnost. Magistrsko delo. Maribor: Ekonomska poslovna fakulteta.
Likar, B. (2001). Inoviranje. Koper: Visoka šola za menedžment.
Podobnik, N. (2009). Notranje organizacijske spodbude za inovativnost v podjetjih. Diplomsko delo. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede.
Šega, M. (2019). Karakteristike vodij za spodbujanje ustvarjalnosti in inovativnosti v organizaciji. Revija za univerzalno odličnost, marec, 2019 letnik št.1., str. 88-89.
