Research on the Principles and Actual Alternative Proposals for a Commercial Negotiation Approach

Authors

  • Božidar Lenarčič
  • Armand Faganel
  • Annmarie Gorenc Zoran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37886/ruo.2023.012

Keywords:

organization, creativity, commercial negotiations, alternative proposals buyer, supplier

Abstract

Research Question: In supplier-customer relations, negotiations are pivotal for shaping collaboration and outcomes. This study has a dual focus: first, it explores modern techniques that favour creative reciprocity over traditional price talks; second, it details alternative approaches for reaching mutually beneficial agreements. The overarching questions guiding this study are: "What are the principles for obtaining alternative proposals to commercial approaches to negotiation?" and "What are concrete alternative proposals to the commercial negotiation approach?" The goal is to transition from conventional to more integrative negotiation methods that benefit both parties.

Purpose: The research aims to raise awareness of supplier-customer collaboration and the importance of mutual goals, particularly in joint development and tech-sharing contexts. It introduces a modern approach to commercial agreements that shifts focus from short-term price talks to long-term mutual benefits.

Method: The first part of the research defines the analytical tool for text interpretation, backed by literature review. The second part presents findings from semi-structured interviews and observations, analysed via thematic network analysis. This approach provides a thorough understanding of supplier-customer negotiation dynamics.

Results: The results of the qualitative research are presented using thematic network analysis, with in-depth analysis and explanation. Findings are summarized descriptively, offering principles for negotiators and specific alternative proposals to traditional negotiation methods. This approach provides nuanced insights for commercial negotiations.

Organization: The study raises awareness of the drawbacks of traditional price negotiations while providing guidelines for modern commercial deals. Negotiators can use these modern alternatives to achieve their goals, reducing organizational constraints and enhancing reputation.

Society: The entire society can benefit from mutual organizational understanding, resolving negotiation conflicts, and reaching agreements. This not only enhances individual organizational reputations but also contributes to overall social cohesion and economic stability.

Originality: The research suggests replacing traditional price negotiations with modern commercial agreements in the supplier-customer relationship, into more collaborative interactions.

Limitations / further research: The research is limited to the sources cited in the literature and interviews with four different profiles. The study is based on the mutual cooperation of the buyer and the supplier in a long-term partnership, thereby excluding the behaviours of the traditional commercial negotiation approach.

References

Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385−405.

Billikopf, G. (2003). Chapter 18: Creative Negotiation. Labor Management Agriculture: Cultivating Personnel Productivity, 2nd edition, Regents of the University of California.

Dannals, J. E., Zlatev, J. J., Halevy, N., & Neale, M. A. (2021). The dynamics of gender and alternatives in negotiation. Journal of Applied Psychology.

De Dreu, C. K., Giacomantonio, M., Shalvi, S., & Sligte, D. (2009). Getting stuck or stepping back: Effects of obstacles and construal level in the negotiation of creative solutions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,45(3), 542−548. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2009.01.00

El-Ashmawi, W. H., Abd Elminaam, D. S., Nabil, A. M., & Eldesouky, E. (2020). A chaotic owl search algorithm based bilateral negotiation model. Ain Shams Engineering Journal.

Fisher, R., Ury, W., Patton, B., & Česen, T. (1998). Kako doseči dogovor: umetnost pogajanja. Gospodarski vestnik.

Förster, J., Friedman, R., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal Construal Effects on Abstract and Concrete Thinking: Consequences for Insight and Creative Cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (87)2, 177−189. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.17

Grepperud, S., & Pedersen, P. A. (2020). Positioning and negotiations: The case of pharmaceutical pricing. European Journal of Political Economy, 62, 101853.

Kim, S. C., & Shin, K. S. (2019). Negotiation Model for Optimal Replenishment Planning Considering Defects under the VMI and JIT Environment. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 35(3), 147-153.

Kumar, K. S., & Jaisankar, N. (2020). An automated resource management framework for minimizing SLA violations and negotiation in collaborative cloud. International Journal of Cognitive Computing in Engineering, 1, 27−35.

Lenarčič, B. (2014). Vrste neetičnih taktik v pogajanju med kupcem in dobaviteljem. RUO. Revija za univerzalno odličnost, 3(2), 66.

Lenarčič, B., & Brcar, F. (2014). Analysis of Influences on Buyer-Supplier Negotiation. Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences, 7(2),81–99.

Lenarčič, B., & Brcar, F. (2012). Vpliv inovativnosti v odnosu kupec – dobavitelj na konkurenčno prednost. Revija za univerzalno odličnost, 1(3), 95–105.

Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2013). When You Shouldnt Negotiate. Retrieved https://www.inkling.com/read/essentials-of-negotiation-lewicki-5th/chapter-1/box-1-1-when-you-shouldnt

Molek, N., de Jager, J. E., & Pucelj, M. (2023). Hero Culture and Silo Mentality: a Systematic Literature Review. Revija za univerzalno odličnost, 12(1).

Možina, S. in Kovač, J. (2006). Prenos – izmenjava znanja. Maribor: Menedžment znanja na poti k učečemu se podjetju.

Nikolic, D., Spasic, J., Zivkovic, Z., Djordjevic, P., Mihajlovic, I., & Kangas, J. (2015). SWOT-AHP model for prioritization of strategies of the resort Stara Planina. Serbian Journal of Management, 10(2), 141−150.

Peleckis, K. (2014). International Business Negotiations: Innovation, Negotiation Team, Preparation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 64−73. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.84

Roblek, V. (2009). Primer Izpeljave Analize Besedila v Kvalitativni Raziskavi (An Example of Performing a Text Analysis in a Qualitative Research). Management, 4(1), 53−69.

Saldaña, J. (2015). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.

Sawa, R. (2020). A prospect theory Nash bargaining solution and its stochastic stability. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization.

Schaerer, M., Loschelder, D. D., & Swaab, R. I. (2016). Bargaining zone distortion in negotiations: The elusive power of multiple alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 137, 156-171.

Shalvi, S., Reijseger, G., Handgraaf, M. J., Appelt, K. C., ten Velden, F. S., Giacomantonio, M., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2012). Pay to walk away: Prevention buyers prefer to avoid negotiation. Journal of Economic Psychology, 38(posebna izdaja, oktober 2013), 40−49.

Soliman, C., & Antheaume, N. (2017). Inter and intra organizational negotiation during economic recession: An essay on the promotion of cooperation. Future Business Journal, 3(1), 23-32.

Stacho, Z., Stachová, K., Hudáková, M., & Stasiak-Betlejewska, R. (2017). Employee adaptation as key activity in human resource management upon implementing and maintaining desired organisational culture. Serbian Journal of Management, 12(2), 303−313.

Tuncel, E., Kong, D. T., Parks, J. M., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020). Face threat sensitivity in distributive negotiations: Effects on negotiator self-esteem and demands. Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 161, 255−273.

Ukil, M. I., & Akkas, M. A. (2017). Determining success factors for effective strategic change: Role of middle managers' strategic involvement. Serbian Journal of Management, 12(1), 29−40.

Urbanc, D. (1996). Znanje, ki ga uporabljamo, je moč. Tržič: Vsak lahko izboljša spomin.

Vukovič, G., & Završnik, B. (2011). Obvladovanje nabave. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za komercialne in poslovne vede.

Gregorio Billikopf. Interpersonal Negotiation Skills. Retrieved from: https://nature.berkeley.edu/ucce50/ag-labor/7labor/17.htm

Zakon o gospodarskih družbah. (2006, 19. april). Uradni list RS št. 42/2006. Retrieved from http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=ZAKO4291#

Published

2026-08-11

Issue

Section

Original Scientific Paper

How to Cite

Research on the Principles and Actual Alternative Proposals for a Commercial Negotiation Approach. (2026). Journal of Universal Excellence, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.37886/ruo.2023.012

Most read articles by the same author(s)