Advantages and Disadvantages of Principles of Scientific Management and Lean Organisation
Keywords:
znanstveno vodenje, vitka organizacija, standardizacija, izobraževanje delavcev, delitev dela.Abstract
Abstract
Background and Originality: In our research we want to represent the advantages and disadvantages of scientific management and lean organisation. We selected four factors as the base for the analysis of advantages and disadvantages of scientific management and lean organisation: standardization of work, education of workers, division of labour and cooperation between management and workers.
Method: As a method, we used text analysis that includes a critical analysis of different or conflicting perspectives on the principles of scientific management and lean organization. We searched for articles in the freely accessible Google Scholar scientific literature search engine.
Results: Based on the studied literature, we found out that scientific management was successful because it satisfied most of the needs of the industrial society at the time. On the other hand, scientific management has limitations and decelerates innovative function in the modern industrial society. The principles of lean organisation supposed to dismiss the deficiencies of scientific management such as lack of motivation, monotonous work, and observation of human as a machine and non-compliance of human nature. However, it turned out that standardization of work, authorization of workers, lean management, teamwork and other factors of lean organisation also reaped similar critics as scientific management did.
Society: The findings of this article may have theoretical and practical implications for those involved in running organizations.
Limitations / further research: In the article, we discussed only the behaviorist aspect. Another limitation is the selected principles through which we observed the advantages and disadvantages of scientific management and lean organization. It would be interesting to extend the observation to other aspects and principles.
Keywords: Scientific management, lean organisation, standardization, education of workers, division of labour.
References
References
Adler, P.S. (1992). The ‘Learning Bureaucracy’: New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. Greenwich: JAI Press
Adler, P. S., & Borys, B. (1996). Two Types of Bureaucracy: Enabling and Coercive. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 61. doi:10.2307/2393986
Ambrož, M. (2009). Viharnost organizacije. Kranj: B&B
Ambrož, M., & Mihalič, T. (1998). The path to excellence: Leadership in a complex and uncertain environment (Pot k odličnosti: Vodenje v kompleksnem in negotovem okolju). Škofja Loka: Institut za samorazvoj.
Baird, K., & Wang, H. (2010). Employee empowerment: extent of adoption and influential factors. Personnel Review, 39(5), 574–599. doi:10.1108/00483481011064154
Ballé, M. (1999). Making bureaucracy work. Journal of Management in Medicine, 13(3), 190–200. doi:10.1108/02689239910269671
Barker, J. R. (1993). Tightening the Iron Cage: Concertive Control in Self-Managing Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 408. doi:10.2307/2393374
Bartezzaghi, E. (1999). The evolution of production models: is a new paradigm emerging? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19(2),229–250. doi:10.1108/01443579910247446
Bateman, N., Esain, A., Massey, L., Rich, N., & Samuel. D. (2006). Lean Evolution:Lessons from the Workplace. New York: Cambridge Univesitiy Press
Bluedorn, A. C. (1986). Special Book Review Section on the Classics of Management. Academy of Management Review, (11)2. doi:10.5465/amr.1986.4283595
Boje, D. M., & Winsor, R. D. (1993). The Resurrection of Taylorism: Total Quality Management’s Hidden Agenda. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 6(4), 57–70. doi:10.1108/09534819310042740
Bouville, G., & Alis, D. (2014). The effects of lean organizational practices on employees’ attitudes and workers’ health: evidence from France. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(21), 3016–3037. doi:10.1080/09585192.2014.951950
Braverman, H. (1998). Labor and Monopoly Capital. New York: Monthly Review Press
Brogan, J. W. (2011). Exonerating Frederick Taylor: after 100 years, mythology sometimes overshadows a master's teachings. Industrial Engineer, 43(11), 41-45.
Carney, D. P., & Williams, R. (1997). No such thing as … scientific management. Management Decision, 35(10), 779–784. doi:10.1108/00251749710192101
Casey, C. (2002). Critical Analysis of Organizations. London: SAGE Publication.
Charron R., Harrington H. J., Voehl F, & Wiggin H. (2015). The lean management systems handbook. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.
Chason, S. (2005). Human Behavior Based Exploratory Model for Successful Implementation of Lean Enterprise in Industry. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 18(2), 76-96
Chauhan, G., & Singh, T. P. (2012). Measuring parameters of lean manufacturing realization. Measuring Business Excellence, 16(3), 57–71. doi:10.1108/13683041211257411
Corbacioglu S. (2017). Influence of Taylorism on Deming’S Quality Management. Sarajevo Journal of Social Sciences Inquiry, 2 (2) 77-78. doi: 10.21533/isjss.v2i2.85
Coriot, B. (1980). The Restructuring of the Assembly Line: A New Economy of Time and Control. Capital & Class, 4(2), 34–43. doi:10.1177/030981688001100102
Dalcher, D. (2017). What has Taylor ever done for us? Scientific and humane management reconsidered. PM World Journal, 6(4).
Dennis P. (2015). The Lean production simplified. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.
Derksen, M. (2014). Turning Men into Machines Scientific Management, Industrial Psychology, and the “Human Factor.” Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 50(2), 148–165. doi:10.1002/jhbs.21650
Dibia, K. I., Nath D. H., & Onuh, S. (2014). Lean “Leadership People Process Outcome” (LPPO) implementation model. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(5), 694–711. doi:10.1108/jmtm-08-2011-0076
Duguid, P. (2015). Making Sense of the Systems of Scientific Management. Le Libellio d’ aegis, 4(1), 5-9.
Emiliani, M. L. (2006). Origins of lean management in America. Journal of Management History, 12(2), 167–184. doi:10.1108/13552520610654069
Fallah Ebrahimi, Z., Wei Chong, C., & Hosseini Rad, R. (2014). TQM practices and employees’ role stressors. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(2), 166–183. doi:10.1108/ijqrm-04-2013-0067
Ferleger, L. A. & Lavallee M. (2015) Taylor’s World Revisited. Business and Economic History, 13, 1-7.
Forrester, R. (1995). Implications of lean manufacturing for human resource strategy. Work Study, 44(3), 20–24. doi:10.1108/00438029510146944
Forza, C. (1996). Work organization in lean production and traditional plants. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 16(2), 42–62. doi:10.1108/01443579610109839
Grachev, M., & Rakitsky, B. (2013). Historic horizons of Frederick Taylor’s scientific management. Journal of Management History, 19(4), 512–527. doi:10.1108/jmh-05-2012-0043
Hasle, P., Limborg, H. J., Kallehave, T., Klitgaard, C., & Andersen, T. R. (2012). The working environment in small firms: Responses from owner-managers. International Small Business Journal, 30(6), 622–639. doi:10.1177/0266242610391323
Hill, V., & Van Buren, H. (2018). Taylor Won: The Triumph of Scientific Management and Its Meaning for Business and Society. Corporate Social Responsibility, 265–294. doi:10.1108/s2514-175920180000002007
Honold, L. (1997). A Review of The Literature on Employee Empowerment. Empowerment in Organizations, 5(4), 202- 212
Hodgetts, R. M., & Greenwood, R. (1995). Frederick Taylor: Alive And Well And Ready For The 21st Century. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1995(1), 218–222. doi:10.5465/ambpp.1995.17536490
Holweg, M. (2007). The genealogy of lean production. Journal of Operations Management 25(2) 420–437. doi: 10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.001
Ishii, K. (2013). A production research to create new value of business output. International Journal of Production Research, 51(23-24), 7313–7328. doi:10.1080/00207543.2013.857441
Jenner, R. (1998). Dissipative enterprises, chaos, and the principles of lean organizations. Omega, 26(3), 397–407. doi:10.1016/s0305-0483(97)00067-4
Kemp, L. J. (2013) Modern to postmodern management: developments in scientific management. Journal of Management History, 19(3), 345-361. doi: 10.1108/JMH-02-2011-0005
Koberg, C. S., Boss, R. W., Senjem, J. C., & Goodman, E. A. (1999). Antecedents and Outcomes of Empowerment. Group & Organization Management, 24(1), 71–91. doi:10.1177/1059601199241005
Koumparoulis, D. N., & Vlachopoulioti A. (2012). The Evolution Of Scientific Management. Academic Research International, 3(2), 420-425.
Krafcik, J.F. (1988). The triumph of the lean production system. Sloan Management Review 30(1), 41–52.
Liker J. K. (2004). The Toyota way. 14 Management Principles from the World s Greatest. New york: McGraw-Hill.
Liker, J. K., & Meier, D. (2006). The Toyota way fieldbook: A practical guide for implementing Toyota’s 4Ps. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Locke E. A. (1982). The Ideas of Frederick W. Taylor: An Evaluation. The Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 14-24. doi: 10.5465/amr.1982.4285427
Miles, M.B., & Huberman, M. A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. London: Sage Publication Ltd.
Monden, Y. (2004). The Toyota management system_linking the seven key functional areas. New York: Productivity Press.
Naruse, T. (1991). Taylorism and Fordism in Japan. International Journal of Political Economy, 21(3), 32-48. doi: 10.1080/08911916.1991.11643821
Nicholas, J. M. (2018). Lean production for competitive advantage : a comprehensive guide to lean methods and management practices. Boca Ration, NW: Taylor & Francis Group.
Paez, O., Dewees, J., Genaidy, A., Tuncel, S., Karwowski, W., & Zurada, J. (2004). The lean manufacturing enterprise: An emerging sociotechnological system integration. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 14(3), 285–306. doi:10.1002/hfm.10067
Pearce, A. D., & Pons, D. J. (2018). Defining Lean Change—Framing Lean Implementation in Organizational Development. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(4) 10-22. doi: 10.5539/ijbm.v12n4p10
Pinchot, G., & Pinchot, E. (1993). The End of Bureaucracy & the Rise of the Intelligent Organization. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers
Prechel, H. (1994). Economic Crisis and the Centralization of Control Over the Managerial Process: Corporate Restructuring and Neo-Fordist Decision-Making. American Sociological Review, 59(5), 723. doi:10.2307/2096445
Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal, 16(1), 15–37. doi:10.1002/smj.4250160105
Pruijt, H. (2000). Repainting, modifying, smashing Taylorism. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(5), 439–451. doi:10.1108/09534810010377417
Ribeiro A. F. (2015). Taylorismo, fordismo e toyotismo (Taylorism, Fordism and Toyotism). Lutas Sociais 19(35), 65-79
Riddersträle J. & in Nordström K. (2004). Karaoke Capitalism Management for Mankind. Edinbourgh: Pearson Education Limited.
Roser, C. (2017). Faster, Better, Cheaper in the History of Manufacturing From the Stone Age to Lean Manufacturing and Beyond. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group
Rossler, P., & Beruvidis, M. (1994). Management theory déjà vu? scientific and total quality management. EMJ - Engineering Management Journal, 6(2), 6-15. doi: 10.1080/10429247.1994.11414780
Simha, A., & Lemak, D. (2010). The value of original source readings in management education: The case of Frederick Winslow Taylor. Journal of Management History, 16(2), 233-252. doi: 10.1108/17511341011030129
Smith, V. (1996). Employee Involvement, Involved Employees: Participative Work Arrangements in a White-Collar Service Occupation. Social Problems, 43(2), 166–179. doi:10.2307/3096996
Styhre, A. (2001). Kaizen, Ethics, and Care of the Operations: Management After Empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 38(6), 795–810. doi:10.1111/1467-6486.00259
Tadajewski, M., & Jones, D. G. B. (2012). Scientific marketing management and the emergence of the ethical marketing concept. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(1−2), 37–61. doi:10.1080/0267257x.2011.619072
Tang H. (2017). The Implications of Taylorism, Contingency Theory, Behavioral Management Theory and Systems Theory on Organization Management in the Globalization Era: A Comparative and Critical Review. 4th International Conference on Education Training, Management and Humanities Science (ETMHS 2018). (str. 119-122), doi: 10.23977/etmhs.2018.29027
Taylor F. W. (1967) Naučno upravljanje (Scientific Management). Beograd: Izdavačko preduzeće Rad
Turan, H. (2015). Taylor’s “Scientific Management Principles”: Contemporary Issues in Personnel Selection Period. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, 3(11), 1102-1105. doi: 10.7763/joebm.2015.v3.342
Unterlechner, M., Meško Štok, Z., & Markič, M. (2009). Innovation, Quality and Lean Six Sigma in the manufacturing process (Inoviranje, kakovost in Lean Six Sigma v proizvodnem procesu). Koper: Fakulteta za management
Vallas, S. P. (1999). Rethinking Post-Fordism: The Meaning of Workplace Flexibility. Sociological Theory, 17(1), 68–101. doi:10.1111/0735-2751.00065
Vidal, M. (2006). Manufacturing empowerment? “Employee involvement” in the labour process after Fordism. Socio-Economic Review, 5(2), 197–232. doi:10.1093/ser/mwl005
Vidal, M. (2007). Lean Production, Worker Empowerment, and Job Satisfaction: A Qualitative Analysis and Critique. Critical Sociology, 33(1-2), 247–278. doi:10.1163/156916307x168656
Vijai, J. P., Somayaji, G. S. R., Swamy, R. J. R., & Aital, P. (2017). Relevance of F.W. Taylor’s principles to modern shop-floor practices. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 24(2), 445–466. doi:10.1108/bij-02-2015-0019
Vo, B., Kongar, E., & Suárez Barraza, M. F. (2019). Kaizen event approach: a case study in the packaging industry. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management. doi:10.1108/ijppm-07-2018-0282
Wagner‐Tsukamoto, S. (2008). Scientific Management revisited. Journal of Management History, 14(4), 348–372. doi:10.1108/17511340810893108
Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T., & Roos, D. (1990). The machines that changed the world. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Idriz Selimović
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.