Zaupanje kot faktor kohezije športnega tima
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37886/ruo.2020.020Ključne besede:
menedžment človeških virov, kohezivnost, košarka, tim, trener, zaupanjePovzetek
Raziskovalno vprašanje (RV): Kakšno vlogo in kako močan vpliv ima zaupanje v soigralce in zaupanje v trenerja na kohezivnost športnega tima?
Namen: Namen je prispevati k teoriji menedžmenta človeških virov s pojasnjevanjem odnosov med zaznavo kakovosti MČV, zaupanjem v sodelavce in nadrejenega ter timsko kohezivnostjo v športu. Na temelju teorije je razvit model, njegova veljavnost pa preverjena v praksi.
Metode: Model je bil testiran na podatkih, zbranih pri 559 košarkarjih iz 73 klubov, in sicer z modeliranjem strukturnih enačb. Uporabljen je tudi Sobelov test učinka posredovanja.
Rezultati: Zaupanje športnikov v trenerja in v soigralce neposredno pozitivno vpliva na raven kohezivnosti tima. Percepcija kakovosti MČV močno neposredno pozitivno vpliva na zaupanje v trenerja, ne pa tudi neposredno na kohezivnost ali na zaupanje v soigralce. Kljub temu se pozitiven učinek percepcije MČV posredno preliva preko zaupanja športnikov v trenerja na njihovo zaupanje v soigralce, posredno pa tudi povečuje stopnjo kohezivnosti tima.
Organizacija: Študija ponuja novo lestvico za merjenje percepcije kakovosti MČV. Opozarja trenerje na nujnost zavedanja pomembnosti zaupanja, ki ga uživajo med športniki, saj je to generator tako zaupanja med samimi športniki kot tudi kohezivnosti.
Družba: Študija poudarja pomen medosebnih odnosov in pojasnjuje, kako ljudje svoje zaupanje pretvarjamo v občutek boljše povezanosti s sodelavci.
Originalnost: Nova lestvica za merjenje percepcije kakovosti dela z ljudmi pri delu. Prva raziskava odnosa kakovosti MČV, dveh timskih relacij zaupanja in kohezivnosti športne ekipe.
Omejitve/nadaljnje raziskovanje: Uporaba subjektivnih podatkov in njihovo zbiranje v samo eni časovni točki. Priporočamo nadaljnje raziskave med športnimi klubi skozi daljše časovno obdobje, v različnih okoljih in v različnih športnih panogah.
Literatura
Adams, B. D., Waldherr, S., & Sartori, J. (2008). Trust in Teams Scale. Trust in Leaders Scale. Manual for Administration and Analyses. Toronto: Department od National Defence.
Alfes, K., Truss, C., Soane, E. C., Rees, C. & Gatenby, M. (2013). The relationship between line manager behavior, perceived HRM practices, and individual performance: examining the mediating role of engagement. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 839–859.
Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Journal, 16(1), 53–101.
Blau, M. P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling (pocket guides to social work research methods). Oxford University Press.
Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion. Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1), 89–106.
Carron, A. V., Bray, S. R., & Eys, M. A. (2002). Team cohesion and team success in sport. Journal of Sport Sciences, 20(2). 119–126.
Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: the Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(3), 244–266.
Crciun, M., & Rus, C. (2009). The relationship between perceived coach leadership behaviours and team cohesion among romanian athletes. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología del Ejercicio y el Deporte, 4(2), 217–231.
Condrey, S. E. (1995). Reforming resource management system: exploring the importance of organizational trust. American Review of Public Administration, 25(4), 341–354.
Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C., & Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural justice from interactional justice. Group and Organizational Management, 27(3), 324–351.
Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 1004–1012.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467.
Dirks, K. T., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2009). The relationship between being perceived as trustworthy by coworkers and individual performance. Journal of Management, 35(1), 136–157.
Gonçalves, S. P., & Neves, J. (2012). The link between perception of human resource management practices and employee well-being at work. Advances in Psychology Study, 1(1), 31–39.
Gould-Williams, J., & Davies, F. (2005). Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of HRM practice on employee outcomes. Public Management Review, 7(1), 1–24.
Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choices in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85–112.
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 45–99.
Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S. & Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective: intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35(3), 246–276.
Jackson, S.E., & Schuler, R.S. (1995). Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 237–64.
Johnson-George, C., & Swap, W. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1306–1317.
Laeequddin, M., Sahay, B. S., Sahay, V., & Waheed, K. A. (2010). Measuring trust in supply chain partners’ relationships. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(3), 53–69.
Li, F., & Harmer, P. (1996). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Group Environment Questionnaire with an intercollegiate sample. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 49–63.
Lu, L. (2015). Building trust and cohesion in virtual teams: the developmental approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 55–72.
Mach, M., Dolan, S., & Tzafrir, S. (2010). The differential effect of team members’ trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 771–794.
Searle, R. H. & Skinner, D. (2011). Trust and human resource management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Tzafrir, S. S. (2005). The relationship between trust, HRM practices and firm performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(9), 1600–1622.
Zafirovski, M. (2005). Social exchange theory under scrutiny: a positive critique of its economic-behaviorist formulations. Electronic Journal of Sociology. Najdeno 25. Marca 2018 na spletnem naslovu: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228349971_Social_exchange_theory_under_scrutiny_A_positive_critique_of_its_economic-behaviorist_formulations.
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159.
