Motivation for Education at the Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Health Care
Keywords:
health, health workers, healthcare, motivation for education, patient, competence, professionalism, lifelong learningAbstract
Research Question (RQ): There is a difference in motivation for education among healthcare providers according to the level of health care.
Purpose: The purpose of the research was to present the concepts of education in health care, healthcare and to examine the motivation for educating health workers at the primary, secondary and tertiary level of health.
Method: The method that we will use will be a qualitative, descriptive approach based on the study of existing literature, articles, and personal experiences.
Results: In the study, we concluded that continuous education is the key to the professional development of an individual. In today's time, continuous tracking of medicine and medicine is inevitable for all those employed in health care, but this can be achieved through continuous education. So that we have concluded that, there is no difference between motivations for education among healthcare providers according to the level of health care. The introduction puts forward the thesis namely: We can confirm there is a difference among healthcare providers according to the level of health care in motivation for education.
Organization: The impact of research on public health is great because healthcare providers through education raise their effectiveness in work processes and, consequently, in the whole organization.
Society: Education positively influences the quality treatment of health care consumers.
Originality: On the basis of a transparent article, the management of health institutions can produce an Index of motivation for education in health care.
Limitations/Future Research: The research was based on domestic and foreign literature and articles.
References
Bengtsson, M. & Ohlsson, B. (2010). The nursing and medical students motivation to attain
knowledge. Nurse Education Today 30 (2010), 150–156.
Česen, M. (2006). Management javne zdravstvene službe. Ljubljana: Center za tehnološko
usposabljanje.
Dernovšček Hafner, N. (2010). Zdravje nižje izobraženih delavcev. Združenje za medicino dela prometa in športa.
Ferjan, M. (1999). Organizacija izobraževanja. Kranj: Moderna organizacija.
Hoyer, S. (2004). Pomen permanentnega izobraževanja v zdravstveni negi. Obzornik Zdravstvene nege; 38.
Kobentar, R. (2008). Socialni odnosi starosti. Socialna pedagogika.
Mally, M. (1993). Organizacija zdravstvenega varstva. Ljubljana: Center za permanentno
izobraževanje Cene Štupar.
Marentič Požarnik, B. (2003). Izkustveno učenje – modna muha, skupek tehnik ali alternativni model pomembnega učenja. Ljubljana: DZS.
Nastić, M., Plazar, N., & Trobec. I. (2010). Razvoj izobraževanja medicinskih sester v Sloveniji, ter njihov pomen za stroko in znanstveno dejavnost zdravstvene nege. Ljubljana: Zdravstvena fakulteta.
Skela-Savič, B., & Kiger, A. (2015) Self-assessment of clinical nurse mentors as dimensions of professional development and the capability of developing ethical values. Nurse Education Today. Pridobljeno na http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2015.04.003.
Skela-Savić, B., Pesjak, K., & Lobe, B. (2016). Evidence-based practice among nurses in Slovenian Hospitals: a national survey. International nursing review, ISSN 1466-7657, Mar. 2016, vol. 63, iss. 1, str. 122-131.
Toth, M. (2003). Zdravje, zdravstveno varstvo. Ljubljana: Zavod za zdravstveno zavarovanje Slovenije.
Zakon o zdravstveni dejavnosti. (1992, 20. februar). Uradni list RS št. 9/92.
Uhan, S. (2001). Vrednotenje dela II. Kranj: Moderna organizacija.
Zaletel, M. Izobraževanje za zdravstveno in babiško nego je spet na prepihu. Obzornik Zdravstvene nege; 41.
Železnik, D. (2003). Izobraževanje za jutri. Obzornik Zdravstvene nege; 37:181-2.
