Trust as the Sport Team Cohesion Factor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37886/ruo.2020.020Keywords:
basketball, coach, cohesiveness, HRM, team, trustAbstract
Research Question (RQ): What role do the trust in teammates and trust in coach have and how strong do they influence the cohesiveness of a sport team?
Purpose: The aim is to contribute to the theory of human resource management by explaining the relationships between the perception of the HRM quality, trust in co-workers and superiors, and team cohesiveness in the context of sport team. The main goal is to develop a model based on theory and test its validity in practice.
Method: The model was tested on data collected from 559 athletes from 73 basketball clubs by structural equation modelling and Sobel's test of mediation.
Results: Athletes’ trust in the coach and in the teammates has direct positive effect on the team cohesiveness. The perception of the HRM quality has a strong direct positive effect on trust in the coach, but does not directly affect cohesiveness or trust in teammates. Nevertheless, the positive effect of the HRM perception indirectly spills over through the athletes’ trust in coach on their trust in teammates, and indirectly also increases the team cohesiveness.
Organization: The article provides a new scale for measuring the perception of HRM quality. It reminds coaches of the importance of athletes’ trust in coach, as it stimulates trust among athletes and cohesiveness.
Society: The study emphasizes the importance of interpersonal relationships and explains how people turn their trust into a sense of better connection with co-workers.
Originality: A new scale for measuring the perception of the HRM quality. It is the first study of relationships between the quality of HRM, two trust relations and team cohesiveness within sport team.
Limitations / further research: Use of subjective data and their collection in only one time point. We recommend further research between sports clubs over a longer period of time, in different environments and in different sports.
References
Adams, B. D., Waldherr, S., & Sartori, J. (2008). Trust in Teams Scale. Trust in Leaders Scale. Manual for Administration and Analyses. Toronto: Department od National Defence.
Alfes, K., Truss, C., Soane, E. C., Rees, C. & Gatenby, M. (2013). The relationship between line manager behavior, perceived HRM practices, and individual performance: examining the mediating role of engagement. Human Resource Management, 52(6), 839–859.
Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (1998). High performance work systems and firm performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Journal, 16(1), 53–101.
Blau, M. P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley.
Bowen, N. K., & Guo, S. (2011). Structural equation modeling (pocket guides to social work research methods). Oxford University Press.
Carron, A. V., & Brawley, L. R. (2000). Cohesion. Conceptual and measurement issues. Small Group Research, 31(1), 89–106.
Carron, A. V., Bray, S. R., & Eys, M. A. (2002). Team cohesion and team success in sport. Journal of Sport Sciences, 20(2). 119–126.
Carron, A. V., Widmeyer, W. N., & Brawley, L. R. (1985). The development of an instrument to assess cohesion in sport teams: the Group Environment Questionnaire. Journal of Sport Psychology, 7(3), 244–266.
Crciun, M., & Rus, C. (2009). The relationship between perceived coach leadership behaviours and team cohesion among romanian athletes. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología del Ejercicio y el Deporte, 4(2), 217–231.
Condrey, S. E. (1995). Reforming resource management system: exploring the importance of organizational trust. American Review of Public Administration, 25(4), 341–354.
Cropanzano, R., Prehar, C., & Chen, P. Y. (2002). Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural justice from interactional justice. Group and Organizational Management, 27(3), 324–351.
Dirks, K. T. (2000). Trust in leadership and team performance: Evidence from NCAA basketball. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 1004–1012.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2001). The role of trust in organizational settings. Organization Science, 12(4), 450–467.
Dirks, K. T., & Skarlicki, D. P. (2009). The relationship between being perceived as trustworthy by coworkers and individual performance. Journal of Management, 35(1), 136–157.
Gonçalves, S. P., & Neves, J. (2012). The link between perception of human resource management practices and employee well-being at work. Advances in Psychology Study, 1(1), 31–39.
Gould-Williams, J., & Davies, F. (2005). Using social exchange theory to predict the effects of HRM practice on employee outcomes. Public Management Review, 7(1), 1–24.
Gulati, R. (1995). Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choices in alliances. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 85–112.
Hackman, J. R., & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 45–99.
Hogg, M. A., Abrams, D., Otten, S. & Hinkle, S. (2004). The social identity perspective: intergroup relations, self-conception, and small groups. Small Group Research, 35(3), 246–276.
Jackson, S.E., & Schuler, R.S. (1995). Understanding human resource management in the context of organizations and their environments. Annual Review of Psychology, 46(1), 237–64.
Johnson-George, C., & Swap, W. (1982). Measurement of specific interpersonal trust: Construction and validation of a scale to assess trust in a specific other. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(6), 1306–1317.
Laeequddin, M., Sahay, B. S., Sahay, V., & Waheed, K. A. (2010). Measuring trust in supply chain partners’ relationships. Measuring Business Excellence, 14(3), 53–69.
Li, F., & Harmer, P. (1996). Confirmatory factor analysis of the Group Environment Questionnaire with an intercollegiate sample. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 18(1), 49–63.
Lu, L. (2015). Building trust and cohesion in virtual teams: the developmental approach. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, 2(1), 55–72.
Mach, M., Dolan, S., & Tzafrir, S. (2010). The differential effect of team members’ trust on team performance: The mediation role of team cohesion. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(3), 771–794.
Searle, R. H. & Skinner, D. (2011). Trust and human resource management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Tzafrir, S. S. (2005). The relationship between trust, HRM practices and firm performance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 16(9), 1600–1622.
Zafirovski, M. (2005). Social exchange theory under scrutiny: a positive critique of its economic-behaviorist formulations. Electronic Journal of Sociology. Najdeno 25. Marca 2018 na spletnem naslovu: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228349971_Social_exchange_theory_under_scrutiny_A_positive_critique_of_its_economic-behaviorist_formulations.
Zaheer, A., McEvily, B., & Perrone, V. (1998). Does trust matter? Exploring the effects of interorganizational and interpersonal trust on performance. Organization Science, 9(2), 141–159.
