With 8D method to excellent quality

Authors

  • Marjanca Krajnc

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37886/

Keywords:

quality assurance, quality tools, problem solving method, 8D method, complaints

Abstract

RQ: The research aims to establish the suitability of the 8D methodology for complaint settlement, and to identify any resulting improvement in quality.

Purpose: Studies that have research the 8D method are scarce in international literature. Consequently, we decided to assess, based on theoretical premises, the suitability of the 8D method used by an organization, and the efficiency of quality performance directly associated with the 8D method. We will establish whether the use of the 8D method results in quality improvement.

Method: The research will be carried out using qualitative analysis in the form of a case study of the 8D method used in an organization.  I will discuss, based on real and relevant data, the approaches implemented by individual 8D method steps, indicating the integrated supplemental tools. In the quantitative part, I will identify the defective product trends (PPM) and the trends of costs related to defective products.

Results: The 8D method used for complaint settlement contributes to improved quality and company performance.

Organization: The results can be used by the management in continuous improvement as additional motivation for more consistent and effective use, and for additional support to problem-solving coordinators and teams.

Society: The findings can also be applied by society at large, mostly companies and public services.

Originality: Research on this topic or combination has not yet been conducted

Limitations: The sample studied is small, limited to one large company. It includes only the data obtained through the use of the 8D method.

References

1. Anand, K. N. (1999). Changing phases of quality department: An Indian experience. Total Quality Management, 10(2), 165–171.

2. Barlow, J., & Moller, C. (1996). A complaint is a gift. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

3. Boshoff, C. (1997). An experimental study of service recovery options. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 8(2), 110–130.

4. Crosby, P. B. (1989). Kakovost je zastonj [Quality is Free]. Ljubljana: Gospodarski vestnik.

5. Doane, D. B. (1987). Explanation of 8D Problem Solving (Eight Disciplines). Retrieved September 28, 2012, from http://www.12manage.com/methods_ford_eight_disciplines_

8D.html

6. Fauzi, A. F. (2011). 8D (Eight disciplines) problem-solving methodology. Retrieved March 27, 2012, from http://www.ahmadfauzi.com/ Download/8D.pdf

7. Kokol, R., & Gladež, E. (2011). Reševanje problemov (8D) in metoda 5 x zakaj [Problem Solving (8D) and the 5 Whys Method]. Sij, 10, 36–38.

8. Marolt, J., & Gomišček, B. (2005). Quality Management [Quality Management]. Kranj: Moderna organizacija.

9. Business Dictionary. (2012, September). BusinessDictionary.com. Retrieved from http://www.businessdictionary.com

10. SSKJ. (2000). Slovar slovenskega knjižnega jezika [Dictionary of Standard Slovene]. Retrieved from http://bos.zrc-sazu.si/sskj.html

11. Ubani, E. C. (2011). Empirical analysis of success factors in the implementation of total quality management in construction industries in Nigeria. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, (2)12, 182–192.

12. Jung, B., Schweißer, S., & Wappis, J. (2011). 8D und 7STEP – Systematisch Probleme lösen [8D and 7 STEPs – Systematic Problem Solving]. München: Carel Hanser Verlag.

13. Adaptive. (2011). 8D Problem Solving Process. Retrieved from http://adaptivebms.com/

Introduction_to_8D_problem_solving_process/

14. Wikipedia. (2012, August 25). Eight Disciplines Problem Solving. Retrieved September 29, 2012, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eight_Disciplines_Problem_Solving

15. Elsmar. (2012, September). The 8-D (Eight Disciplines) Problem Solving Methodology. Retrieved from http://elsmar.com/8D/

16. 8DReport. (2012). Difference between Containment, Corrective and Preventive Actions in 8D Report. Retrieved from http://www.8dreport.com/articles/difference-between-containment-corrective-and-preventive-actions-in-8d-report/

17. Siliconfareast. (2003). 8D – The Disciplines Process. Retrieved September 29, 2012, from http://www.siliconfareast.com/8D.htm

Published

2026-08-20

Issue

Section

Professional Article

How to Cite

With 8D method to excellent quality. (2026). Journal of Universal Excellence, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.37886/

Most read articles by the same author(s)