Z dokazi podprte prakse v fizioterapiji
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37886/Ključne besede:
z dokazi podprta praksa, z dokazi podprta obravnava, mnenje, prepričanja, implementacija, fizioterapija, spretnosti, znanjePovzetek
Raziskovalno vprašanje (RV): Kakšen je odnos in kakšna so prepričanja fizioterapevtov o uporabi izsledkov temelječih na dokazih v fizioterapevtskih praksah?
Namen: Na podlagi fokusirane analize literature predstaviti odnos in prepričanja fizioterapevtov v tujini do uporabe z dokazi podprte fizioterapevtske prakse, ki bi lahko predstavljali podlago za analizo stališč fizioterapevtov v Sloveniji.
Metoda: Prispevek temelji na teoretičnem pristopu. Zajema kritično in sistematično analizo objavljenih člankov v obdobju od leta 2000 do 2015, pridobljenih v elektronskih podatkovnih zbirkah SpringerLink, ScienceDirect, Pubmed, Cinahl, Embase in PEDro. Uporabljene so bile štiri faze vključitvenega izbora študij.
Rezultati: Po vključitvenem izboru je bilo analiziranih enajst študij. Rezultati so pokazali veliko težav in omejitev v poznavanju, spretnostih, vedenju ter ovir pri izvajanju z dokazi podprte fizioterapevtske prakse s katerimi se fizioterapevti v tujini srečujejo.
Organizacija: Rezultati ponujajo koristne informacije za primerjavo odnosa in prepričanj o uporabi izsledkov temelječih na dokazih v fizioterapevtski praksi v Sloveniji.
Družba: Sistematična fokusirana analiza in sinteza navedenih študij bi bila lahko v pomoč pri oblikovanju gradnikov modela za implementacijo z dokazi podprte prakse za slovenske fizioterapevte.
Originalnost: Analiza stališč fizioterapevtov v tujini bi lahko bistveno pripomogla k učinkoviti implementaciji uporabe izsledkov temelječih na dokazih v fizioterapevtski praksi v Sloveniji, kajti odnos in prepričanja slovenskih fizioterapevtov niso znana.
Omejitve/nadaljnje raziskovanje: Omejitev sistematičnega pregleda literature tega prispevka je v primernosti izbora glede na metodološko kakovost in število fokusirano analiziranih študij. Izvirne študije ne pojasnjujejo razlogov omejitev v poznavanju in uporabi z dokazi podprte prakse, niti ne predlogov za izboljšanje. Jasno torej je, da je potrebnih več raziskav za boljše razumevanje težav pri implementaciji z dokazi podprte prakse.
Literatura
APTA - American Physical Therapy Association. Working operational definitions of elements of vision 2020: from the task force on strategic plan to achieve vison 2020. June, 2007, 1-2. Pridobljeno na: www.apta.org
Baker, R., Camosso-Stefinovic, J., Gillies, C., Shaw, E. J., Cheater, F., Flottorp, S., & Robertson, N. (2010). Tailored interventions to overcome identified barriers to change: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (3), CD005470. Advance online publication. http://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub2
Bauer, I., Lechner, S, Walt, S., & Wojciech J. (2007). Evidence-based practice in physiotherapy: the current situation in Germany as compared to England (part 2) [in German] Z Physiother,59:122-37.
Bernhardsson, S., Johansson, K., Nilsen, P., Oberg, B., & Larsson, M. E. (2014). Determinants of guideline use in primary care physical therapy: a cross-sectional survey of attitudes, knowledge, and behavior. Phys Ther,94, 343-54.
Buchard, P. A. La pratique fondee sur les resultats probants en physiotherapie. Position des physiotherapeutes valaisans francophones. (2009). Kinesitherapie, 91, 50-7.
Bury, T. Evidence based practice – an overview. WCPT Keynotes 2003, 1-2. Pridobljeno na: www.wcpt.org
CPA - Canadian Physiotherapy Association (2016). Position statement. June, , 1-2. Pridobljeno na: www.physiotherapy.ca http://www.physiotherapy.ca/Advocacy/Position-Statements
CSP - Charted Society of Physiotherapy (2005). Core standards of physiotherapy practice. London: Charted Society of Physiotherapy.
CSP - Charted Society of Physiotherapy (2006). Guideline programme review. London: Charted Society of Physiotherapy.
CSP - Charted Society of Physiotherapy (2006). Guidence for developing clinical guidelines. London: Charted Society of Physiotherapy.
Dawes, M., Summerskill, W., & Glaziou, P. (2005). Sicily statement on evidence-based practice. BMC Med Educ, 5, 1-7.
DFS - Društvo fizioterapevtov Slovenije – Strokovno združenje (2015). Temeljni standardi za fizioterapevtsko prakso. Puh, U., Zupanc, A., & Hlebš, S. (ur.). Ljubljana: Društvo fizioterapevtov Slovenije – Strokovno združenje.
ER-WCPT - European Region of the Word Confederation for Physical Therapy. European Core Standards of Physiotherapy Practice. (2008). General Meeting 22–24 May 2008. Athens: European Region Word Confederation for Physical Therapy. Pridobljeno na http://www.physio-europe.org
ER-WCPT - European Region of the Word Confederation for Physical Therapy. (2010). Clinical Guideline Development Programmes in the European Region of WCPT. General Meeting 27–29 May 2010. Berlin: European Region Word Confederation for Physical Therapy, Pridobljeno na http://www.physio-europe.org
ER-WCPT - World Confederation for Physical Therapy. (2001). Evidence based practice: an international perspective report of an expert meeting organised by WCPT in October 2001: Executive summary; World Confederation for Physical Therapy, 1-2. Pridobljeno na: http://www.wcpt.org
Gorgon, E. J-, Barrozo, H. G-, Mariano, L. G., & Rivera, E. F. (2013). Research evidence uptake in a developing country: a survey of attitudes, education and self-efficacy, engagement, and barriers among physical therapists in the Philippines. J Eval Clin Pract,19, 782-90.
Grimmer-Somers, K., Lekkas, P., Nyland, L., Young, A., & Kumar, S. (2007). Perspectives on research evidence and clinical practice: a survey of Australian physiotherapists. Physiother Res Int,12, 147-61.
Guyatt, G. (1991). Evidence-based medicine. ACP J Club, A16, 114.
Haynes, R. B., Devereaux, P. J., & Guyatt, G. H. (2002). Clinical expertise in the era of evidence-based medicine and patient choice. Vox Sang, 83 suppl 1, 383-386.
Herbert R., Jamtvedt G., Mead J., Chalmers I. (2012). Practical evidence-based physiotherapy: (2 izd.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
Iles R, Davidson M. Evidence based practice: a survey of physiotherapists' current practice. (2006). Physiother Res Int,11(93),103.
Jette, D., U., Bacon, K., Batty, C., Carlson, M., Ferland, A., Hemingway, R., D., Hill, C., D., …Volk, D. (2003). Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. Phys Ther,83(9), 786-805.
Kodeks etike fizioterapevtov Slovenije. (2002). Uradni list RS št. 6/02.
Kumar, S. (2015). Evidence-based practice in physiotherapy: opportunities and challenges in implementing best practice in clinical practice. Physiotherapy, 101, 797-798. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0502-3
Lord, S. Evidence based practice 2: the New Zealand experience. WCPT Keynotes 2005; Pridobljeno na http://www.wcpt.org
McColl, A. Smith, H., White, P., & Field, J. (1998). General practitioner's perceptions of the route to evidence based medicine: a questionnaire survey. Br Med J, 316, 361-5.
Mead, J., & van der Wees, P. (2006). Clinical guidelines 1: an introduction. WCPT Keynotes. Pridobljeno na http://www.wcpt.org
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA group. (2009). Preferred reporting Items for systematic rviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Medicine, 6(7), e1000097. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Nilsagård Ylva LG. (2010). Evidence-based physiotherapy: a survey of knowledge, behaviour, attitudes and prerequisites. Adv Physiother,12, 179-86.
Parker-Taillon, D. (2002). CPA initiatives put the spotlight on evidence-based practice in physiotherapy. Physiotherapy Canada,12-15, 24.
Queiroz, P. S. & Santos, M. J. D. (2013). Facilidades e habilidades do fisioterapeuta na procura, interpretaçao e aplicaçao do conhecimento científico na pratica clínica: um estudo piloto: easiness and skillfulness of physical therapists in searching, interpreting and applying scientific knowledge in clinical practice: a pilot study, 26,13-23.
Sackett, D. L, Rosenberg, W. M. C, Gray, J. A. M. (1996). Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312, 71-72.
Salbach, N. M, Jaglal, S. B., Korner-Bitensky, N., Rappolt, S., & Davis, D. (2007). Practitioner and organizational barriers to evidence-based practice of physical therapists for people with stroke. Phys Ther, 87,1284-303.
Scholten-Peeters, G. G., Beekman-Evers, M. S., van Boxel, A. C., van Hemert, S., Paulis WD, van der Wouden, J. C., & Verhagen A. P. (2013). Attitude, knowledge and behaviour towards evidence based medicine of physical therapists, students, teachers and supervisors in the Netherlands: a survey. J Eval Clin Pract,19, 598-606.
Scholten-Peeters, G. G, Beekman-Evers, M. S, van Boxel, A. C., van Hemert, S., Paulis, W. D., & van der Wouden, J. C. (2013). Attitude, knowledge andbehaviour towards evidence-based medicine of physical therapists, stu-dents, teachers and supervisors in the Netherlands: a survey. J Eval ClinPract, 19, 598–606.
Scurlock-Evans, L., Upton, P., & Upton, D. (2014). Evidence-based practice in physiotherapy: a systematic review of barriers, enablers and interventions. Physiotherapy,100, 208–19.
van der Wees, P., & Mead, J. (2004). Framework for clinical guideline development in physiotherapy. General Meeting 13-15 May. Limassol: European Region World Confederation for Physical Therapy, 2004. Pridobljeno na http://www.physio-europe.org
Walker, J. (2005). Reading tips for the clinician 2: Criteria for deciding the quality of an article. WCPT Keynotes. Pridobljeno na http:// www.wcpt.org
Walker, J. (2005). Reading tips for the clinician 3: Are study results good enough to be generalised? WCPT Keynotes. Pridobljeno na http://www.wcpt.org
Walker, J. (2002). Reading tips for the clinician: How to tell whether an article is worth reading. WCPT Keynotes. Pridobljeno na http:// www.wcpt.org
World Confederation for Physical Therapy. (2002). Evidence based practice – an international perspective: Report of an expert meeting of WCPT member organisations 13-15 October 2001. London: Word Confederation for Physical Therapy, 1-35. Pridobljeno na http:// www.wcpt.org
