Ageing in Place Driving Urban Transformations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37886/Keywords:
housing for seniors, assisted living housing facilities, ageing in place, homecareAbstract
Research question: This article provides an answer to the question: What kind of housing do the seniors in Slovenia prefer after a substantial decrease of their functional capacities, i.e. when they already need long-term care services?
Purpose: During the study, the seniors participating in the study were still able to live in their current dwelling – in the home where they lived for years together with their family or alone; but because of a substantial decrease of their functional capacities they had become aware that it would be difficult to continue to stay there. We wanted to know where they would like to migrate or move to when needed, and what kind of housing should be provided on the housing market for these cohorts.
Method: After our study of the relevant European and American literature we found that the construction of housing for seniors can be developed in different types of structures and that there is a substantial gap between the needs and the availabilities of housing arrangements in Slovenia, which also increases the rigidity of the Slovenian housing market and reduces land rent in comparison with USA and Western Europe. Seniors using long-term care services provided by municipalities in their own homes, living outside the main Slovenian central places, were included in the survey. To identify the preferred structure of the built environment for seniors we organised 3 groups of interviews with assisted living inhabitants from three Slovenian municipalities and evaluated the percentages of each desired type of housing and care.
Results: The results show that more than half of Slovenian seniors do not have the possibility to move to retirement villages or other better adapted homes in assisted living housing units, where they could protect their dignity and independence better than in institutional care in nursing homes.
Local administration and society: These findings refer to the local administration initiative to (a) built proper housing units for seniors with decreasing functional capacities themselves, or (b) to initiate investments in local areas that would, in turn, attract private investments in proper and affordable housing for seniors.
Novelty: This study is the first of its kind in Slovenia while its results provide better insight into what matters most to Slovenian seniors regarding their housing arrangements.
Further extension: The study could give different results in the case of metropolitan areas, e.g. for the case of Ljubljana.
References
1. Black, K., & Dobbs, D. (2015). Community-Dwelling Older Adults’ Perspectives on What Matters Most: Findings From an Exploratory Inquiry. Activities, Adaptation & Aging, 39:2,133-152, DOI: 10.1080/01924788.2015.1025674.
2. Black, K., & Dobbs, D. (2013). Community-dwelling older adults’ perceptions of dignity: Core meanings, supports, challenges, and opportunities. Ageing & Society. Advance online publication. doi:10.1017/S0144686X13000020
3. Bogataj, D., Szander, N., Ros-Mcdonnell, D. (2015). Španski model bivalnega prostora in zagotavljanje dolgotrajne oskrbe: (Kaj se lahko centralno-evropske in vzhodnoevropske države naučijo od Španije). Dolgotrajna oskrba: izzivi in priložnosti: oskrbovalni in bivalni vidiki, (MEORL, Ser.n. 19). Šempeter pri Gorici: MEDIFAS; Ljubljana: Skupnost socialnih zavodov Slovenije, p. 59-80.
4. EC, 2015. Innovation for Active & Healthy Ageing. European Summit on Innovation for Active and Healthy Ageing, Final Report. Brussels: EC and Partners.
5. Kavšek, M., Bogataj, D. (2015). Smernice kakovosti dolgotrajne oskrbe. In: Ros Mcdonnell, L., Bogataj, D. , Kavšek, M. (Eds). Dolgotrajna oskrba : izzivi in priložnosti : oskrbovalni in bivalni vidiki, (MEORL, ser. n. 19). Šempeter pri Gorici: MEDIFAS; Ljubljana: Skupnost socialnih zavodov Slovenije, p. 1-27.
6. Ros Mcdonnell, L., Bogataj, D., Kavšek, M. (2015). Dolgotrajna oskrba : izzivi in priložnosti : oskrbovalni in bivalni vidiki, (MEORL, Ser.n.. 19). Šempeter pri Gorici: MEDIFAS; Ljubljana: Skupnost socialnih zavodov Slovenije.
7. DEMHOW Group of authors(2009), »Home ownership as wealth over the life cycle, European Household Motivation for Residential Assets « http://www.demhow.bham.ac.uk/reports/A3.pdf),
8. European Commission (2010). GREEN PAPER towards adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems, Brussels, COM(2010) 365/3. {SEC(2010) 830}; http://www.eupensiondebate.eu/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=KXIZNBtyvj4%3D&tabid=3802 (available 22.11.2015).
9. European Commission (2015a). The 2015 Pension Adequacy Report: current and future income adequacy in old age in the EU, Volume I, Brussels. (available 22.11.2015).
10. European Commission, (2012). WHITE PAPER An Agenda for Adequate, Safe and Sustainable Pensions, COM(2012) 55 final, Brussels. (available on 22.11.2015).
11. European Commission, (2015b). The 2015 Ageing Report: Economic and budgetary projections for the 28 EU Member States (2013-2060) Brussels.
12. European Commission, (2015c).. Innovation for Active & Healthy Ageing. European Summit on Innovation for Active and Healthy Ageing, Final Report. Brussels: EC and Partners.
13. Council of the European Union, Social Protection Committee (2014). Adequate social protection for long-term-care needs in an ageing society, Brussels.
14. European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority - EIOPA (2012). Consultation papers; https://eiopa.europa.eu/consultations/consultation-papers/index.html (available on 22.11.2015).
15. Kavšek, M.(2012). Razvoj smernic kakovosti storitev dolgotrajne oskrbe starejših. Magistrska naloga. Univerza v Mariboru, FOV, Kranj.
16. Stula, S. (2012) Living in Old Age in Europe - Current Developments and Challenges. Observatory for Sociopolitical Developments in Europe, WP 7, Berlin: Deutscher Verein für öffentliche und private Fürsorge e.V.
17. United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. Subcommittee on Housing, Transportation, and Community Development (2009). Modernizing affordable housing for seniors and people with disabilities, Washington DC: (DLC) 2010532173, (OCoLC)671917965.
