Koncept prepoznavanja dejavnikov tihe odpovedi v organizacijah: Integrativni pregled literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37886/ip.2023.006Ključne besede:
tiha odpoved dela, zaposleni, organizacija, zadržanje zaposlenih, delovno mesto, delovno okolje, ravnanje z ljudmi, pandemija covid-19Povzetek
Raziskovalno vprašanje (RV): Kateri dejavniki pomembno vplivajo na koncept tihe odpovedi v organizacijah?
Namen: Namen integrativnega pregleda literature je podrobneje preučiti koncept tihe odpovedi v organizacijah. Cilj izčrpnega pregleda je na podlagi relevantne literature identificirati dimenzije koncepta in prepoznati dejavnike, ki nanj vplivajo.
Metoda: Primarna raziskovalna metodologija temelji na integrativnem pregledu literature. Zbiranje podatkov je potekalo v skladu s smernicami, ki jih narekuje uveljavljen formalen postopek oziroma standard PRISMA. Osnovno orodje za pridobivanje relevantne in za našo raziskavo ustrezne literature predstavlja pripravljena matrika raziskovalnih baz in uporabljenih ključnih besed iskanja. Literatura je bila iskana v podatkovnih bazah SpringerLink, Scopus, ProQuest, ScienceDirect, Cobiss, dLib, Google Učenjak, Emerald in ResearchGate. Časovni okvir iskanja smo opredelili od leta 2019 do leta 2023. Izločili smo literaturo, ki se neposredno ne nanaša na naše področje raziskovanja in nima odprtega dostopa. Zbrane podatke smo analizirali z metodo metasinteze.
Rezultati: Med dejavnike, ki pomembno vplivajo na koncept tihe odpovedi smo identificirali: slabo cenjeni zaposleni, pomanjkanje zavezanosti organizacij h kariernemu razvoju zaposlenih, neupoštevanje zaposlenih, izključenost zaposlenih pri organizacijskih odločitvah, nezadostna avtonomija pri delu in upad zaupanja v organizacijo. Iz tega sledi, da je prepoznavanje potreb zaposlenih ključni koncept na katerih je potrebno graditi strategije, ki vodijo v uspešno in učinkovito upravljanje tihe odpovedi.
Organizacija: Naša raziskava ponuja vpogled v razsežnost koncepta in prikazuje dejavnike vpliva, ki organizacijam omogočajo pravočasno in uspešno prepoznavanje koncepta v svojih sredinah.
Družba: Potencialno zmanjševanje prispevka posameznikov v gospodarstvu, v negativnem smislu vpliva tako na samo gospodarstvo, kot tudi na celotno družbo.
Originalnost: Tema je podraziskana, zato ocenjujemo, da je potrebno nadaljnje poglobljeno raziskovanje navedenega področja.
Omejitve/nadaljnje raziskovanje: Preučevanje teme je zaznano, istočasno pa opaženo, da temu ne sledijo znanstvene raziskave. V analizo so bili uvrščeni izvirni članki, izločena pa je bila vsa literatura brez odprtega dostopa. Pripravljen integrativni pregled omogoča nadaljnje poglobljeno raziskovanje tega področja in predstavlja podlago za izdelavo doktorske disertacije.
Literatura
Ali, S. (2022). Evaluating the effect of covid-19 on mid-level 1 evaluating the effect of covid-19 on mid-level college administrators’ roles at four-year private institutions in new jersey. (Doctoral thesis). Caulfield School of Education: Saint Peter’s University.
Andrulli, R., & Gerards, R. (2023). How new ways of working during COVID-19 affect employee well-being via technostress, need for recovery, and work engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 107560. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2022.107560.
Aydin, E. & Azizoğlu, Ö. (2022). A New term for an existing concept: quiet quitting-a self- determination perspective. International Congress on Critical Debates in Social Sciences.
Bell, R. & Kennebrew, D. (2023). What Does Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Chester I. Barnard Have to Do With Quiet Quitting? American Journal of Management, 23(1)2023. doi: 10.33423/ajm.v23i1.5869
Boy, Y., & Sürmeli, M. (2023). Quiet quitting: A significant risk for global healthcare. Journal of Global Health, 13, 03014. https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.13.03014
Cao, J., & Hamori, M. (2022). Adapting careers to the Covid crisis: The impact of the pandemic on employees’ career orientations. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 139. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JVB.2022.103789
Chugh, A. (2021, March 23). What is The Great Resignation and what can we learn from it. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/11/what-is-the-great-resignation-and-what-can-we-learn-from-it/
Cieniewicz, A. (2023). Commitment Profiles of Federal Government Employees Who Telework: A Qualitative Study Associate Professor of Human and Organizational Learning. (Doctoral thesis). The Graduate School of Education and Human Development of The George Washington University.
Engelmann, J. N. (2022). The Concept of Humble Leadership to Strengthen Employee Performance during the Covid-19 pandemic in an International Corporation in Germany (Doctoral thesis). The Adrian Dominican School of Education of Barry University.
Formica, S., & Sfodera, F. (2022). The Great Resignation and Quiet Quitting paradigm shifts: An overview of current situation and future research directions. Journal of Hospitality Marketing and Management, 31(8), 899–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/19368623.2022.2136601
Harter, J. (2022, March 16). Is Quiet Quitting Real? Retrieved from https://www.gallup.com/workplace/398306/quiet-quitting-real.aspx
Harvey, S. (2023). Qualitative case study on the relationship between workloads and the impact it has on employee job satisfaction (Doctoral thesis). Glen R. Jones College of Business of Trident University International
Hickok, M. (2022, March 2022). Employee Monitoring is Not a Solution for Quiet Quitting. Google Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Qvnb4XuUxdbgtfpaqaZmVDIjaoPzsR10/view
Hofschulte-Beck, A. (2022). The Long-Term Impacts of Remote Working on Employees and Employers. (Doctoral thesis). The College of St. Scholastica, Duluth, MN.
Klotz, A. & Bolino, M. (2022, March 23). When Quiet Quitting Is Worse Than the Real Thing. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2022/09/when-quiet-quitting-is-worse-than-the-real-thing
Liu-Lastres, B., Wen, H., & Huang, W. J. (2022). A reflection on the Great Resignation in the hospitality and tourism industry. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(1), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-05-2022-0551/FULL/PDF
Luchs, C. (2023). Instructional Design: A Workforce Perspective for 2023. TechTrends, 67(1), 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11528-022-00818-6/METRICS
Mahand, T. & Caldwell, C. (2023). Quiet Quitting – Causes and Opportunities. Business and Management Research, 12(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.5430/bmr.v12n1p9
Marsh, E., Vallejos, E. P., & Spence, A. (2022). The digital workplace and its dark side: An integrative review. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107118. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHB.2021.107118
Morrison-Beedy, D. (2022). Editorial: Are We Addressing “Quiet Quitting” in Faculty, Staff, and Students in Academic Settings? Building Healthy Academic Communities Journal, 6(2), 7–8. https://doi.org/10.18061/BHAC.V6I2.9309
Na-Nan, K., Kanthong, S., & Joungtrakul, J. (2021). An Empirical Study on the Model of Self-Efficacy and Organizational Citizenship Behavior Transmitted through Employee Engagement, Organizational Commitment and Job Satisfaction in the Thai Automobile Parts Manufacturing Industry. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC7030170
Narayanamurthy, G., & Tortorella, G. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on employee performance – Moderating role of industry 4.0 base technologies. International Journal of Production Economics, 234, 108075. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJPE.2021.108075
Ng, E., & Stanton, P. (2023). Editorial: The great resignation: managing people in a post COVID-19 pandemic world. Personnel Review, 52(2), 401–407. https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-03-2023-914
Ninaus, K., Diehl, S., & Terlutter, R. (2021). Employee perceptions of information and communication technologies in work life, perceived burnout, job satisfaction and the role of work-family balance. Journal of Business Research, 136, 652–666. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2021.08.007
Patel, P. C., & Rietveld, C. A. (2023). Right of association and new business entry: country-level evidence from the market sector. Small Business Economics, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11187-022-00727-1/TABLES/4
Pronk, N. P. (2022). Addressing COVID-19 Disruptions at the Workplace While Preparing for a Postpandemic Future. ACSM’s Health and Fitness Journal, 26(3), 52–55. https://doi.org/10.1249/FIT.0000000000000764
Rameshkumar, M. (2020). Employee engagement as an antecedent of organizational commitment – A study on Indian seafaring officers. Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 36(3), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJSL.2019.11.003
Ratnatunga, J. (2022, March 16). Quiet Quitting: The Silent Challenge of Performance Management. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/368273479_Quiet_Quitting_The_Silent_Challenge_of_Performance_Management
Rock, D. & Dixit, J. (2022, March 22). Are Our Brains Wired to Quiet Quit? Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2023/01/are-our-brains-wired-to-quiet-quit.
Serenko, A. (2023). The human capital management perspective on quiet quitting: recommendations for employees, managers, and national policymakers. Journal of Knowledge Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-10-2022-0792
Shafiq, B., Aburub, H., & Aburub, B. S. (2020). Employee Retention & Engagement Solution. Open Journal of Business and Management, 8(6), 2805–2837. https://doi.org/10.4236/OJBM.2020.86173
Telford, T. (2022, March 15) This is what quiet quitting really looks like. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2022/08/21/quiet-quitting-what-to-know/
Wilkinson, L. (2022). Adapting to Meet the Challenges of Post-Pandemic Employee Engagement. (Doctoral thesis). The College of St. Scholastica, Duluth, MN
Dodatne datoteke
Objavljeno
Številka
Rubrike
Licenca
Avtorske pravice (c) 2023 Nastja Pevec
To delo je licencirano pod Creative Commons Priznanje avtorstva-Deljenje pod enakimi 4.0 mednarodno licenco.
