Ocenjevanje kompetenc z mehko logiko
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37886/Ključne besede:
kompetentnost, kompetence, ocenjevanje, vrednotenje, mehka logikaPovzetek
Raziskovalno vprašanje (RV): Ocenjevanje kompetenc je zapleteno. Vprašanje je, kako kompetenco, ki je bila ocenjevana z metodo 360 stopinjskega ocenjevanja, z orodji mehke logike ovrednotiti v enotni skupni rezultat, kot oceno dejanske razvitosti te kompetence pri obravnavanem posamezniku.
Namen: Namen in cilj raziskovanja je določitev možnega postopka vrednotenja kompetenc, ki bi omogočal oblikovanje enotne ocene kompetence z uporabo metod mehke logike.
Metoda: Teoretični del zajema pregled stanja in izrazoslovja na področju kompetenc in mehke logike. Empirični del temelji na kvantitativni raziskavi. Za testiranje modela so uporabljen podatki iz anketnega vprašalnika.
Rezultati: V raziskavi je oblikovan in testiran primer modela vrednotenja kompetence »Iniciativnost«. Testiranje je potrdilo, da je postopek vrednotenja z uporabo mehke logike učinkovit.
Organizacija: Raziskava ima neposreden vpliv na razvoj kadrovske funkcije v praksi organizacij. Omogoča lažje in bolj usmerjeno vrednotenje kompetenc.
Družba: Raziskava omogoča lažje usmerjanje v razvoj kompetenc, ki lahko izboljšajo urejenost družbe, posredno tudi socialno odgovornost in okolje.
Originalnost: Raziskava izvirno podaja model vrednotenja kompetence z uporabo mehke logike.
Omejitve/nadaljnje raziskovanje: Raziskava je omejena na primer ene kompetence in posameznih ocenjevalcev. Zanimivo bi bilo raziskati model v primeru več istovrstnih ocenjevalcev.
Literatura
1. Blank, W. (2001). The 108 skills of natural born leaders. New York: Amacom.
2. Bramming, P. & Holt Larsen, H. (2000). Making sense of the drive for competence. V C. Brewster & H. Holt Larsen (ur.), Human resource management in Northern Europe: Trends, dilemmas and strategy (str. 66-88). UK: Blackwell publishers.
3. Burgoyne, J. & Stuart, R. (1976). The nature, use and acquisition of managerial skills and other attributes. Personnel Review, 5(4), 19–29.
4. Colarič Jakše, L. M. & Ambrož, M. (2015). Actor-Network Theory and Stakeholder Collaboration: The case of Slovenia. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(3), 231-239. doi:10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n3s2p231
5. Comite Europeen de Normalisation. (2015). EN ISO 9001:2015: Quality management systems - Requirements. Bruxelles: author.
6. Conti, T. (2007). A history and review of European Quality Award Model. The TQM Magazine, 19(2), 112-128. doi 10.1108/09544780710729962
7. García, R.E., Benjamin, G.F., & Perez, R. B. (2014). Impact assessment of training with fuzzy logic. Revista Chilena de Ingeniería, 22(1), 41–52.
8. Gruban, B. (2005). Sebe razkrivamo skozi druge - metode povratne informacije 360°. Human resource management magazine, 3(10), 22–27.
9. Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
10. Hensel, R., Meijers, F., Van der Leeden, R. & Kessels, J. (2010). 360 degree feedback: how many raters are needed for reliable ratings on the capacity to develop competences, with personal qualities as developmental goals?. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(15), 2813–2830.
11. Houé, R., Grabot, B. & Tchuente, G. (2011). Fuzzy logic in competence management. EUSFLAT-LFA 2011, 1(1), 651-656.
12. INFORM Software Corporation. (2001). User’s Manual for all fuzzyTECH 5.5 Editions. Aachen: author.
13. Jevšček, M. & Gorenc-Zoran, A. (2015). Kompetenca ali kompetentnost? HRM : strokovna revija za ravnanje z ljudmi pri delu, 13(64), 58-60.
14. Lassere, A. A. A., Solabac, M. V. L., Hernandez-Torres, R., Posada-Gomez, R., Juárez-Martínez, U., & Lambert, G. F. (2014). Expert system for competences evaluation 3600 feedback using fuzzy logic. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014(789234), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/789234
15. Macwan, N. & Srinivas, S. P. (2013). Performance Appraisal using Fuzzy Evaluation Methodology. International Journal of Engineering and Innovative Technology. 3: 324-329
16. Macwan, N. & Srinivas, S. P. (2014). A Linguistic Fuzzy Approach for Employee Evaluation. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering. 1, 975-980.
17. Math Works. (2014). Fuzzy Logic Toolbox™ User's Guide. Natick: author.
18. McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 1(28), 1–14.
19. Mittal, K. C., Goel, A. K., & Mohindru, P. (2013). Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) in human resource selection procedure - a case study of Indian IT industry. BVIMR Management Edge, 6(1), 89–97.
20. Moradi, M., Maleki, M. & Pilehrod, H.A. (2015). Leadership competency evaluation by integration of fuzzy Shannon's entropy and VIKOR methods. Global journal of advanced research, 2(12), 1864-1870.
21. Pedrycz, W. & Gomide, F. (2007). Fuzzy Systems Engineering: Toward Human Centric Computing. New Yersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
22. Pépiot, G., Cheikhrouhou, N., Fürbringer, J.-M. & Glardon, R. (2008). A fuzzy approach for the evaluation of competences. International Journal of Production Economics, 112(1), 336-353. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.025
23. Ross, T. J. (2010). Fuzzy Logic with Engineering Applications, 3rd Edition. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
24. Sanghi, S. (2007). The handbook of competency mapping. New Delhi: Sage.
25. Spencer, L. M. & Spencer, S. M. (1993). Competence at work: models for superior performance. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
26. Suleman, A. & Suleman, F. (2012). Ranking by competence using a fuzzy approach. Quality & Quantity, 46(1), 323-339. doi: 10.1007/s11135-010-9357-1
27. Svetlik, I. & Pavlin, S. (2004). Izobraževanje in raziskovanje za družbo znanja. V Z. Mlinar (ur.), Demokratizacija, profesionalizacija in odpiranje v svet, Teorija in praksa, 41 (1/2), 199-211.
28. Usenik, J. (2008). Mehka logika in mehke množice. Celje, Krško: Fakulteta za logistiko.
29. Yu-Chen, C. & Tien-Chin W. (2007). Applying Fuzzy Theory to the Management Competency Assessment for Middle Managers. 6th WSEAS International Conference on Applied Computer Science, Kitajska, Hangzhou, 15.-17. april 2007, 7-12.
30. Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
31. Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy Sets, Information and Control, 8, 338-353.
