Comparative Analysis of the Promotion of Creativity and Innovation in Selected Organizations

Authors

  • Bojan Krajnc
  • Mirko Markič

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37886/ruo.2024.015

Keywords:

EFQM, building blocks, sub-building blocks, quality, management, company, creativity, innovation

Abstract

Research question (RQ): How to carry out an evaluation of the component of promoting creativity and innovation based on the excellence model of the European Foundation for Quality Management (hereinafter EFQM) in the selected company?

Purpose: The purpose of the research was to assess the level of development of the building blocks for promoting creativity and innovation, and based on the obtained results, formulate proposals for improvements.

Method: In the theoretical part of the research, we focused on a descriptive approach, with the help of which we reviewed the professional literature and available empirical research. In the empirical part of the research, we basically performed a qualitative research method. In order to obtain primary data, we conducted a structured interview with five managers in all organizational units of the selected company. We performed basic and more demanding statistical processing on the information obtained in this way.

Results: From the results of the empirical part of the research, it follows that the average value of the seven sub-building blocks is 3.27. The highest score of 4.5 was found for the fourth sub-building block Based on an understanding of the market and opportunities, they set precise goals for innovation that are supported by appropriate policies and resources. The lowest score of 2.2 was found for the seventh grade. Implementation of ideas in time frames that allow to maximize the benefits achieved. We have prepared suggestions for managers in the continuous improvement of the innovation process in the selected company.

Organization: The research on the level of development of the building blocks for promoting creativity and innovation has a significant impact on the selected company, as we have prepared a starting point for the introduction of changes with the information obtained.

Society: Investigating the degree of development of the building blocks of promoting creativity and innovation in the selected company can also contribute to the creation of an innovation culture in the economy and the wider social ecosystem.

Originality: We have come to new knowledge about the level of development of the building blocks of promoting creativity and innovation, which increase the number of available information. We gained original insights into improving creativity and innovation.

Limitations/further research: The research focused on one building block of the EFQM excellence model in one company. To gain a deeper understanding, it would be useful to conduct comparative analyzes between different companies.

References

Bertoncelj, A., Bervar, M., Meško, M., Naraločnik, A., Nastav, B., Roblek, V., & Trnavčević, A. (2015). Trajnostni razvoj. Ljubljana: GV založba.

Bijek, L. (2019). Odnosi, komunikacija, motivacija in nagrajevanje kot dejavniki uspešnega tima in organizacije. Revija za univerzalno odličnost, junij, 2019 letnik št.2., str. 179-192.

Bukovec. B. (2010). Otoška rastoča strategija univerzalne odličnost in mojstrstva. 20. Maj 2010 (str.6-7) Novo mesto, Fakulteta za organizacijske študije v Novem mestu

EFQM (2020a). The EFQM model. Brussels, EFQM.

EFQM (2020b). How is the EFQM Model 2020 development doing? (2020, 15. december). Pridobljeno na https://www.efqm.org/index.php/2019/05/10/how-is-the-efqm-model-2020- development-doing/

EFQM Leading Excellence 2012. (2013). Model odličnosti EFQM (brošura). SPIRIT Slovenija, javna agencija.

Fakulteta za organizacijske študije. (2020, 12. november). FOŠmeter poslovne odličnosti: Preglednica ocen. Pridobljeno na https://moodle.fos-unm.si/course/view.php?id=194.

»FOŠmeter poslovne odličnosti: Preglednica ocen« (2020).

Generalni sekretariat Vlade RS, Sektor za prevajanje (2012) Model odličnosti EFQM 2013. Ljubljana, Ministrstvo za gospodarski razvoj in tehnologijo, Urad RS za meroslovje (MIRS)

Hojč D. (2019). Revija za univerzalno odličnost. Model vpliva dodane vrednosti za odjemalce ter inovativnost, 8(2), 169-179. Pridobljeno 13.11.2020 na https://www.fosunm.si/media/pdf/RUO/2019-8-2/Hojc.pdf

Interno gradivo: FOŠmeter poslovne odličnosti: Preglednica ocen

Kligl, A. (2010). Ustvarjalnost in inovativnost slovenskih podjetij. Diplomsko delo. Maribor: Ekonomska poslovna fakulteta.

Koubek, A. (2016). Priročnik ISO 9001:2015 – Razumevanje in izvajanje novih zahtev. Ljubljana, Prevzeto na http://kakovosten.si/2017/10/11/osredotocenost-na-odjemalce/

Likar, B. (2001). Inoviranje. Koper: Visoka šola za menedžment

MIRS, Strategija poslovne odličnosti 2018-2030. (2017). Ljubljana: Urad RS za meroslovje. MIRS, EFQM model odličnosti. (2012). Ljubljana: Urad RS za meroslovje.

Slovensko združenje za kakovost in odličnost. (2019). Kakovost.

Šega, M. (2019). Karakteristike vodij za spodbujanje ustvarjalnosti in inovativnosti v organizaciji. Revija za univerzalno odličnost, marec, 2019 letnik št.1., str. 88-89.

Published

2026-08-11

Issue

Section

Original Review Paper

How to Cite

Comparative Analysis of the Promotion of Creativity and Innovation in Selected Organizations. (2026). Journal of Universal Excellence, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.37886/ruo.2024.015

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>