Fundamental Autopoietic Building Blocks in 4.0 Organization as a Challenge to Humane Organization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37886/Keywords:
autopoiesis, allopoiesis, autopoietic organization, 4.0 organization, autopoietic building blocks, directional building blocks, process building blocks, human capitalAbstract
Research question (RQ): The area of a human, organizations and Organizations is complex and with new aspects of 4.0 organization even more complex. We did an autopoietic outline with horizontal and vertical view of a researcher who sticks to humanity of an individual and organizations. The research question stems from the central study: Which are building blocks of autopoises in a modern and which in 4.0 organization?
Purpose: To detect, recognize, research principles of autopoiesis and setting building blocks of autopoiesis in organizations. We are interested in a human in organization, in interpersonal co-dependance on micro and macro level. Inside this more and more virtual organization we are studying a human, humanity and human potential as a creative potential of humane organization.
Method: Action research with mixed methods for comprehensive study of autopoietic principle and methodology of setting the autopoietic building blocks. We used Atlas.ti software and methodological informational software »Informational graph of Autopoiesis - IGA«. Validation was carried out with double triangulaton (static and dynamic view).
Results: We formed and validated four directional building blocks and 36 process building blocks, which are shown in a human as: emotions, thinking, directing and activity. Significant difference in two process building blocks of autopoiesis in modern and 4.0 organization confirms the set thesis statement that the building blocks of modern and 4.0 organization are different. We detected that in 4.0 organization the process building blocks of self-/co-feeling and self-/co-referencing aregetting weaker. With results we claim that 4.0 organization is oriented mostly towards action and is getting stronger in improved communication. However, it decreases in emotions and thinking of a human in an organization.
Organization: Results can serve as a guideline and challenge to humane organizations. We present the challenge how – by knowing horizontal and vertical laws of a human – we can »control« 4.0 organization. The research contributes to awareness of a human and to transformation of allopoietic to more and more autopoietic organizations, which repesents a move from mechanistic to humane paradigm.
Society: Accepting autopoiesis on all levels of society and consequently emerging organizations, as well as society as a whole. The final result is to influence by autopoiesis the cultural development of society in the sense of connecting science, art, high technologies and spirituality.
Originality: Interlacement of horizontal and vertical areas of theory, multilayer view of research of organization with »IGA« and validation with double triangulation.
Limitations/Future resesarch: Relatively modest range of references on the subject of Industry 4.0. Research of directional and process building blocks in »IGA«. Founding an institute for studying autopoiesis on all levels of society.
References
Albers, A., Gladysz, B., Pinner, T., Butenko, V., & Stürmlinger, T. (2016). Procedure for Defining the System of Objectives in the Initial Phase of an Industry 4.0 Project Focusing on Intelligent Quality Control Systems. Science Direct. 52, 262-267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.067
Ambrož, M., & Colarič Jakše, L. M. (2015). Pogled raziskovalca: Načela, metode in prakse. Mednarodna založba za slovanske jezike in književnosti, Maribor.
Aristotel, (2002). Nikomahova etika. Slovenska matica, Ljubljana.
Aristotel, (2012). O nastajanju in propadanju. Slovenska matica, Ljubljana.
Ash, J. (2012). Rethinking affective atmospheres: Technology, perturbation and space times of the non-human. Geoforum. 49, 20-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.006
Balažic Peček, T. (2016). Naravni modeli mišljenja kot izziv človeka pri etičnih konceptih v organizaciji (Natural Models of Mind as a Challenge of a Person in Ethical Concepts in an Organization). 35. Mednarodna konferenca o razvoju organizacijskih znanosti: Trajnostna organizacija, Slovenija, Portorož, 16.-18. marec 2016, str. 56-69, Maribor: Fakulteta za organizacijske vede.
Balažic Peček, T., & Bukovec, B. (2017) Razsežnost principa "autopoiesis" v organizaciji in družbi. Revija za univerzalno odličnost, ISSN 2232-5204, mar. 2017, letn. 6, št. 1, str. 39-54. http://www.fos.unm.si/media/pdf/RUO/2017-6-1/RUO_069_BALAzIC_PEcEK_BUKOVEC.pdf. [COBISS.SI-ID 2048403714]
Balažic Peček, T., Lauc, A., Železnikar, A. P., & Bukovec, B. (2017). From Allopoietic to Autopoietic Self-management. (Od alopoietskoga do avtopoietskog samo-upravljanja). DIJALOG, časopis za filozofiju i društvenu teoriju, 10-2 – 10-1 – 581-2/17
Beck, U. (2001). Družba tveganja: Na poti v neko drugo moderno. Zavod za odprto družbo, Ljubljana.
Bokrantz, J., Skoogh, A., Berlin, C., & Stahre, J. (2017). Maintenance in digitalised mannufacturing: Delphi-based scenarios for 2030. International Journal of Production Economics, 191, 154-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.06.010
Bukovec, B. (2009). Nova paradigma obvladovanja sprememb. Fakulteta za uporabne družbene študije, Nova Gorica.
Capra, F. (1986). Vrijeme preokreta: Znanost, društvo i nastupajuća kultura. ČGP Delo, OOUR Globus, Izdavačka djelatnost, Zagreb.
Capra, F. (1997). Tao fizike: Jedno istraživanje paralela između suvremene fizike i istočnjačkom misticizma. Opus, Beograd.
Capra, F. (2002). The Hidden Connections: Integrating the Biological, Cognitive, and Social Dimensions of Life into a Science of Sustainability. Doubleday, New York.
Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The System View of Life: A Unifying Vision. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
Dalai Lama XIV (2000). Etika za novo tisočletje: Njegova Svetost dalajlama. Učila, založba, d.o.o., Tržič.
Djurdica, B. (2011). Zdravljenje prostorov z življenjsko-kozmično energijo: Čisto okolje. Alternativa, Ljubljana
Ećimović, T. (2016). Univerzalna vzgoja in izobraževanje in Filozofija trajnostne sonaravne prihodnosti Slovenk in Slovencev. Mestna knjižnica, Izola.
Feyerabend, P. K. (1999). Proti metodi. Studia humanitatis, Ljubljana.
Feyerabend, P. K. (2007). Spoznanje za svobodne ljudi. Založba krtina, Ljubljana.
Feyerabend, P. K. (2008). Znanost kot umetnost. Zbirka Sodobna družba/Sophia, Ljubljana.
Gosar, A. (1994). Sodobna socialna etika: Sociološke in gospodarske osnove. Založba Rokus d.o.o., Ljubljana.
Harari, Y. N. (2015). Sapiens: Kratka zgodovina človeštva. Mladinska knjiga, Ljubljana.
Hlebš, J. (2017). Darwin, evolucija in/ali starjenje. Mohorjeva založba, Celovec.
Ivanko, Š. (2012). Organizacijske paradigme: Podlaga za nastanek in razvoj organizacijskih teorij. Fakulteta za organizacijske študije, Novo mesto.
Jantsch, E. (1980). The Self-Organisation Universe: Scientific and Human Implications of the Emerging Paradigm of evolution. British Library Cataloging in Publication Data, Oxford.
Komat, A. (2015). Če boste molčali, bodo kamni govorili. Samozaložba in Buča d.o.o., Domžale.
Kordeš, U. (2004). Od resnice k zaupanju. Studia humanitatis, Ljubljana.
Kordeš, U., & Smrdu, M. (2015). Osnove kvalitativnega raziskovanja. Založba univerze na Primorskem, Koper.
Kuhn, T. S. (1998). Struktura znanstvenih revolucij. Zavod za odprto družbo, Ljubljana..
Kukić, S. (2015). Metodologija znanstvenog iztraživanja. Nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo.
Lauc, A. (2000). Metodologija društvenih znanosti. Sveučilišče J.J. Strosmayera u Osijeku, Pravni fakultet. Grafika, Osijek.
Lauc, A., & Balažic Peček, T. (2017) Nova paradigma: Re-procesiranje alopoietske v avtopoietsko organizacijo. V: Bukovec, B. (ur.). Avtopoietska organizacija. Novo mesto: Fakulteta za organizacijske študije., str. 43-69, ilustr. [COBISS.SI-ID 2048428546]
Lauc, Z. (2016). Moralitet-Legimitet-Legalitet: zbirka radova. Sveučilišče J.J. Strosmayera, Pravni fakultet. Grafika, Osijek.
Lasan, M. (2005). Stalnost je določila spremembo: Fiziologija. Fakulteta za šport, Inštitut za šport, Ljubljana.
Levi-Strauss, C. (1985). Oddaljeni pogled. Založba ŠKUC Znanstveni inštitut Filozofske fakultete, Ljubljana.
Luhmann, N. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
Mali, F. (2006). Epistemologija družbenih ved: Razlaga in razumevanje. Fakulteta za družbene vede, Ljubljana.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the Living. D. Reidel Publishing Company, London.
Maturana, H. R., & Varela, F. J. (1998). Drevo spoznanja. Studia humanitatis, Ljubljana.
Mesec, B. (1994). Model akcijskega raziskovanja. Socialno delo 33, 1: 3-16.
Mesec, B. (1998). Uvod v kvalitativno raziskovanje v socialnem delu. Visoka šola za socialno delo, Ljubljana.
Mesec, B. (2009). Akcijsko raziskovanje. Pridobljeno (2017, 24. julij) na https://sites.google.com/site/kvalitativnametodologija/akcijsko- raziskovanje/predstavitve-1/.
Mulej, M. in sod. (2000). Dialektična in druge mehkosistemske teorije: Podlaga za celovitost in uspeh managementa. Ekonomsko-poslovna fakulteta, Maribor.
Neugebauer, R., Hippmann, S., Leis, M., 2016, Industrie 4.0 - From the Perspective of Applied Research. Science Direct. 57, 2-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2016.07.067
Ovsenik, J. (1999). Stebri nove doktrine organizacije, managementa in organizacijskega obnašanja. Moderna organizacija, Kranj.
Ovsenik, J. (2010). Kakšna organizacija kaže pot iz krize 2008+ (What kind of Organisation should be Reconceived to Trace a Way Out of the Crisis 2008+?). 29. Mednarodna konferenca o razvoju organizacijskih znanosti: Človek in organizacija, Slovenija, Portorož, 24.-26. marec 2010, (str. 1007-1018), Maribor: Fakulteta za organizacijske vede.
Ovsenik, M., & Ambrož, M. (2006). Upravljanje sprememb poslovnih procesov. Turistica – Visoka šola za turizem Portorož, Portorož.
Pavuna, D., osebni razgovori in korespondenca z avtorjem (Karlovac, Zagreb, 2016).
Pavuna, D., & Balažic Peček, T. (2017). Zapiski raziskovanj pojavov kvantne fizike v avtopoietski organizaciji.
Roblek, V. Meško, M., & Krapež, A. (2015). A complexity view of industry 4.0. Sage Open. 6(2). doi:10.1177/2158244016653987
Salminen, K., & Kovač, I. (2012). Role Basaed Self-Adaption of Reconfigurable Robotized Systems for Sustanaible Manufacturing. V: FAIM 2012, 22nd International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, June 10th-13th 2012, Helsinki, Finland, Tampere, Tampere University of Technology, Department of Production Engineering, 2012, 8 str.
Salminen, K., & Kovač, I. (2012). Role Basaed Self-Adaption of Reconfigurable Robotized Systems for Sustanaible Manufacturing. V: FAIM 2012, 22nd International Conference on Flexible Automation and Intelligent Manufacturing, June 10th-13th 2012, Helsinki, Finland, Tampere, Tampere University of Technology, Department of Production Engineering, 2012, 8 str.
Schwab, K. (2016). Četrta industrijska revolucija. World Economic Forum, Ženeva.
Spinoza, B. (1988). Etika. Slovenska matica, Ljubljana.
Tesla, N. (2013). Moji izumi (My inventions). Založba Sanje, Ljubljana.
Trstenjak, A. (1985). Človek bitje prihodnosti: Okvirna antropologija. Slovenska matica, Ljubljana.
Veza, I., Mladineo, M., & Gjeldum, N. (2015). Managing Innovative Production Network of Smart Factories. Science Direct. 48(3) 555-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.06.139
Železnikar, A. P. (2015). Informational Consciousness and Half-Consciousness. Humankybernetik Band 56 · Heft 3, Akademia Libroservo / IfK.
Železnikar, A. P. osebni razgovori in korespondenca z avtorjem (Ljubljana, 2016-2017).
Železnikar, A. P. (2015) Filozofsko besedotvorje (Philosophical Word Formation). Pridobljeno (2017, 27. julij) na http://lea.hamradio.si/~s51em/book/Medit339slo.pdf.
