Why and how to be socially responsible?

Authors

  • Milan Simončič

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37886/

Keywords:

social responsibility of organizations, stakeholders, motives for social responsibility, cultural environment

Abstract

Research Question (RQ): Modern society is critical more and more to social irresponsible actions. Organizations
are aware of that fact, in the strategy of its operations want to include the implementation of socially responsible
principles. We are interested in how various authors perceive the concept of social responsibility of organizations,
what they are benefits of socially responsible organization, how organizations implement its mission, including its
external stakeholders involvement and how that activities affects the diversity of cultural environments.
Purpose: Study and summary a portion of the available references, in which the authors for different purposes
research the social responsibility of organizations. We confronted and compared different viewpoints.
Method: We used the method of description (description of facts) and method of compilation (summary of known
results of scientific research).
Results: The collected references are categorized by selected areas presented the classification of the authors,
which address particular areas of social responsibility, the resources classified by years of posts and articles by
scientific journals.
Organization: Organizations will summarize the findings and use it as a starting point for further research,
evaluation and eventual optimization of existing models of the concept of corporate social responsibility.
Society: Findings will be used as a keystone for further research, society will be aware of the importance of
implementing the principles of social responsibility, they will meet the challenges of coexistence with the social
responsible organizations.
Originality: Groups, which will use the results for further empirical research, are the wider society and
organizations who want to improve their image and carry out socially responsible actions. Review of articles
highlights various views, which in other articles did not found.
Limitations/Future Research: Review of articles was limited to some journals and includes only some of the
areas of importance for understanding the problems of deployment and implementation, and the motives for
corporate social responsibility. Articles, order than 15 years, not included due to lack of interest in the present
circumstances. In further research it would be welcome to increase the number of analyzed articles and take focus
to some more specific areas (for instance: consider implementing social responsibility of specific organizations, such as nuclear power plants, chemical industry, evaluate possible further ethical dilemmas in health care, genetic
research, cybernetics, etc.).

References

1. Avetisyan, E., & Ferrary, M. (2012). Dynamics of stakeholders’ implications in the

institutionalization of the CSR field in France and in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics,

115(1), 115–133. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1386-3

2. Balzarova, M. A., & Castka, P. (2012). Stakeholders’ influence and contribution to social

standards development: the case of multiple stakeholder approach to ISO 26000 development.

Journal of Business Ethics, 111(2), 265–279. doi: 10.1007/s10551-012-1206-9

3. Bertoncelj, A., Meško, M., Naraločnik, A., & Nastav, B. (2011). Trajnostni razvoj organizacije.

Ljubljana: GV Založba.

4. Bhattasharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how costumers

respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47(1), 9–25.

5. Birth, G., Illia, L., Lurati, F., & Zamparini, A. (2008). Communicating CSR: practices among

Switzerland`s top 300 companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 13(2),

182–196. doi: 10.1108/13563280810869604

6. Boulouta, I., & Pitelis, C. N. (2014). Who needs CSR? The impact of corporatesocial

responsibility on national competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), 349–364. doi:

10.1007/s10551-013-1633-2

7. Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: corporate associations and

costumer product responses. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 68–84. doi: 10.2307/1252190

8. Busse, R., Sun, L., & Zhu, V. (2013). Authenticity shortage of corporate social responsibility.

Human Systems Management, 32(28), 243–248. doi: 10.3233/HSM-130799

9. Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral

management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

10. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: a

review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1),

85–105. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x

11. Chernev, A., & Blair, S. (2015). Doing well by doing good: the benevolent halo of corporate

social responsibility. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(6), 1412–1425. doi: 10.1086/680089

12. Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Green paper, promoting a European

framework for corporate social responsibility. Pridobljeno na http://eur-lex.europa.eu/

LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2001:0366:FIN:EN:PDF

13. De Cole, S., Henriques, A., & Sarasvathy, S. (2014). The Paradox of Corporate Social

Responsibility Standards. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 177–191. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-

1912-y

14. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social

responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management

Reviews, 12(1), 8–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x

15. Evropska komisija. (2010). Evropa 2020, Strategija za pametno, trajnostno in vključujočo rast.

Bruselj: Evropska komisija.

16. Fadun, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) practices and stakeholders expectations:

the Nigerian perspectives. Research in Business and Management, 1(2), 13–31. doi:

10.5296/rbm.v1i2.5500

17. Freeman, E. R. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston - London -

Melbourne - Toronto: Pitman.

18. Freeman, E. R. (2004). The stakeholder approach revisited. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts-und

Unternehmensethik, 5(3), 228-241. doi: 10.3763/jsfi.2010.0008

19. Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies . Academy of Management Review, 24(2),

191-205.

20. Fukukawa, K., & Teramoto, Y. (2008). Understanding Japanese CSR: the reflections of managers

in the field of global operations. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(1), 133–146. doi: 10.1007/s10551-

008-9933-7

21. Ghoul, S. E., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C. C., & Mishra, D. R. (2011). Does corporate social

responsibility affect the cost of capital? Journal of Banking and Finance, 35(9), 2388–2406. doi:

10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007

22. Glavaš, A., & Kelley, K. (2014). The effects of perceived corporate social responsibility on

employee attitudes. Business Ethics Quarterly, 24(2), 165–202. doi:10.5840/beq20143206

23. Goss, A., & Roberts, G. S. (2011). The impact of corporate social responsibility on the cost of

bank loans. ournal of Banking and Finance, 35(7), 1794–1810. doi: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.

2010.12.002

24. Graafland, J., Mazereeuw, C., & Van der Schouten, D. (2012). Motives for corporate social

responsibility. De Economist, 160(4), 377–396. doi: 10.1007/s10645-012-9198-5

25. Gray, R., Owen, D., & Adams, C. (1996). Accounting & Accountability: Changes and Challenges

in Corporate Social and Environmental Reporting. London: Prentice Hall International.

26. Guidance on social responsibility ISO 26000:2010, 1st edition. (2010). Geneve: International

Organization for Standardization.

27. Hackert, A., Krumwiede, D., Tokle, J., & Vokurka, R. J. (2012). Global corporate social

responsibility practices and cultural dimensions. Advanced Management Journal, 77(4), 33–41.

28. Idowu, S. O., & Louche, C. (2011). Theory and practice of corporate social responsibility. Berlin:

Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-16461-3

29. Ivanko, Š. (2007). Sodobne teorije organizacije. Ljubljana: Fakulteta za upravo.

30. Jančič, Z. (2004). Družbena odgovornost podjetij in marketinški koncept. Teorija in praksa, 41(5-

6), 890–901.

31. Kanji, G. K., & Chopra, P. K. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in a global economy. Total

Quality Management, 21(2), 119–143. doi: 10.1080/14783360903549808

32. Lehtimäki, H., Kujala, J., & Heikkinen, A. (2011). Corporate responsibility in communication:

empirical analysis of press releases in a conflict. Business Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 432–

449. doi: 10.1177/1080569911424203

33. Lindgreen, A., Swaen, V., & Maon, F. (2008). Introduction: corporate social responsibility

implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 251–256. doi: 10.1007/s10551-008-9732-1

34. Luo, X., & Du, S. (2014). Exploring the relationship between corporate social responsibility and

firm innovation. Marketing Letters, 87(1), 57–69. doi: 10.1007/s11002-014-9302-5

35. Mandl, I., & Dorr, A. (2007). CSR and competitiveness european SMEs´ good practices,

consolidated european report. Vienna: Austrian Institute for SME Research.

36. Martínez, P., Pérez, A., & Rodríguez del Bosque, I. (2014). Exploring the role of CSR in the

organizational identity of hospitality companies: a case from the Spanish tourism industry. Journal

of Business Ethics, 124(1), 47–66. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1857-1

37. Modic, D. (2008). Innovative issues and approaches in social sciences. Slovenian Association for

Innovative Political Science – SIDIP, 1(3), 7–42.

38. Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder

information, response and involvement strategies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 15(4),

323–338. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00460.x

39. Mosgaller, T. (2012). Putting Social Responsibility Into Practice. The Journal for Quality and

Participation, 34(4), 39–40.

40. O’Riordan, L., & Fairbrass, J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): models and theories

in stakeholder dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(4), 745–758. doi: 10.1007/ s10551-008-

9662-y

41. Organizacija. (29. 04 2015). Organizacija. Pridobljeno na Organizacija:

http://organizacija.fov.uni-mb.si/index.php/organizacija/about/ editorialPolicies# focusAndScope

42. Ovsenik, M., & Ambrož, M. (2010). Celovitost in neznatnost organizacije. Ljubljana: Institut za

management.

43. Pater, A., & van Lierop, K. (2004). Sense and sensitivity: the roles of organisation and

stakeholders in managing corporate social responsibility. Business Ethics: A European Review,

15(4), 339–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8608.2006.00461.x

44. Peloza, J., & Shang, J. (2010). How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for

stakeholders? A systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 117–135.

doi: 10.1007/s11747-010-0213-6

45. Peršič, A., & Markič, M. (2013). The Impact of Social Responsibility Vision and Strategy on

Successful Corporate Operations. Managing Global Transitions, 11(1), 27–40.

46. Piriyakul, M., & Wingwon, B. (2013). Effect of corporate ability and reputation on organizations’

performance and CSR. African Journal of Business Management, 7(9), 738–749.

doi:10.5897/AJBM12.1227

47. Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., & Grau, S. L. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate social

responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 70,

125–140. doi: 10.1007/s10551-006-9100-y

48. Pless, N. M., Maak, T., & Waldman, D. A. (2012). Different Approaches Toward Doing the Right

Thing: Mapping the Responsibility Orientations of Leaders. Academy of Management

Perspectives, 26(4), 51–65.

49. Potočan, V., & Mulej, M. (2007). Družbena odgovornost trajnostnega podjetja. Organizacija,

40(5), 129–133.

50. Pour, B. S., Nazari, K., & Emami, M. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: A literature review.

African Journal of Business Management, 8(7), 228–234. doi: 10.5897/AJBM12.106

51. Ramič, S. (2012). Družbeno odgovorno poslovanje. 9. festival raziskovanja ekonomije in

managementa, (str. 437–443). Koper, Celje, Škofja Loka.

52. Rivolli, P., & Waddock, S. (2011). "First They Ignore You...": The Time-Context Dynamic and

Corporate Responsibility. California Management Review, 53(2), 87–104.

53. Rozman, R., & Kovač, J. (2012). Management. Ljubljana: GV Založba.

54. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new

directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ ceps.1999.1020

55. Sallinen, L., Ruuska, I., & Ahola, T. (2013). How governmental stakeholders influence large

projects: the case of nuclear power plant projects. International Journal of Managing Projects in

Business, 6(1), 51–68. doi: 10.1108/17538371311291026

56. Salmones, M., Crespo, A. H., & Bosque, I. R. (2005). Influence of corporate social responsibility

on loyalty and valuation of services. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 369–385. doi:

10.1007/s10551-005-5841-2

57. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2009). Research methods for business students, 5/e.

Harlow, UK: Pearson Education.

58. Schaefer, B. P. (2008). Shareholders and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(2),

297–312. doi: 10.1007/s10551-007-9495-0

59. Schwartz, M. S., & Carroll, A. B. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: a three-domain

approach. Business Ethics Quaterly, 13(4), 503–530.

60. Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer

reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38, 225–243. doi:

10.1509/jmkr.38.2.225.18838

61. Serajnik - Sraka, N. (2009). Komunikacijske kampanje: priročnik za načrtovanje, vodenje in

ocenjevanje kampanj. Ljubljana: GV Založba.

62. Sheehy, B. (2014). Defining CSR: problems and solutions. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:

10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x

63. Snider, J., Hill, R. P., & Martin, D. (2003). Corporate Social Responsibility in the 21st Century: A

View from the World´s Most Successful Firms. Journal of Buisiness Ethics, 48(2), 175–187.

64. Sobczak, A., & Havard, C. (2014). Stakeholders’ influence on French unions’ CSR strategies.

Journal of Business Ethics, 1–14. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2159-y

65. Sohn, L. B. (1973). The Stockholm declaration on the human environment. The Harvard

international law journal, 14(3), 423–515.

66. Strand, R., Freeman, E. R., & Hockerts, K. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and

sustainability in Scandinavia: an overview. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(1), 1–15. doi:

10.1007/s10551-014-2224-6

67. Sun, L., & Stuebs, M. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility and Firm Productivity: Evidence

from the Chemical Industry in the United States. Journal Business Ethics, 118(2), 251–263. doi:

10.1007/s10551-012-1579-9

68. Swaen, V., & Chumpitaz C., R. (2008). Impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer

trust. Recherche et Applications en Marketing, 23(4), 7–33.

69. Swift, T. (2001). Trust, reputation and corporate accountability to stakeholders. Business Ethics,

10(1), 16–26.

70. Tari, J. J. (2011). Research into Quality Management and Social Responsibility. Journal of

Business Ethics, 102(4), 623–638. doi: 10.1007/s10551-011-0833-x

71. Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidenceinformed

management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management,

14, 207–222. doi: 10.1111/1467-8551.00375

72. Tschopp, D., & Nastanski, M. (2013). The Harmonization and Convergence of Corporate Social.

Journal of Business Ethics, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1906-9

73. Vallentin, S. (2013). Governmentalities of CSR: Danish government policy as a reflection of

political difference. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–15. doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1703-5

74. Verboven, H. (2011). Communicating CSR and business identify in the chemical industry through

mission slogans. Business Communication Quarterly, 74(4), 415–431. doi:

10.1177/1080569911424485

75. Yoon, Y., Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Schwarz, N. (2006). The effect of corporate social responsibility

(CSR) activities on companies with bad reputations. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4),

377–390. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_9

76. Zink, K. J. (2005). Stakeholder orientation and corporate social responsibility as a precondition for

sustainability. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 16(8–9), 1041–1052. doi:

10.1080/14783360500163243

77. Živko, T., Zver, M., & Bobek, V. (2005). Kultura v kontekstu ekonomije: študije in raziskave.

Koper: Univerza na Primorskem, Fakulteta za menedžment Koper.

Published

2026-08-21

Issue

Section

Original Scientific Paper

How to Cite

Why and how to be socially responsible? (2026). Journal of Universal Excellence, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.37886/

Most read articles by the same author(s)